2023
DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.128767.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Islamic legal perspectives on digital currencies and how they apply to Jordanian legislation

Abstract: Background: The industrial transformation requires a speedy shift to financial digitization. One of the needs for financial digitalization in the study of Islamic contracts and Islamic business law is the use of digital platforms with digital currencies. Regarding the merits and downsides of its Sharia restrictions and its halal certification, which is currently under discussion, digital currencies and perks have generated controversy in Jordan and other Islamic countries. Methods: This study intends to analyz… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 25 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There may be constitutional restrictions that make the establishment of central bank digital currencies difficult outside of the European Union as well. For example, from a Jordanian and Islamic point of view, digital currencies are incompatible with Islamic law in their current form and should abide by the rules of Islamic banking [ 73 ]. China's lawmakers could encounter legal problems as well, as a result of the adoption of a legal digital currency.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There may be constitutional restrictions that make the establishment of central bank digital currencies difficult outside of the European Union as well. For example, from a Jordanian and Islamic point of view, digital currencies are incompatible with Islamic law in their current form and should abide by the rules of Islamic banking [ 73 ]. China's lawmakers could encounter legal problems as well, as a result of the adoption of a legal digital currency.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%