Islamic Preaching and State Regulation in Indonesia

Abstract

Indonesia’s Muslim preachers carry out their mission in a regulatory environment that is liberal when compared with the demanding regulations negotiated by preachers in Brunei and Malaysia. In recent times, however, the Indonesian government has given signs that it might favour a stricter regime of supervision and control. The authors – all of them social scientists with experience in studying Islamic communication in Indonesia – evaluate the pros and cons of such a move. Throughout this working paper, the authors approach preaching as a variety of public communication, but do not assume that preaching messages should faithfully replicate national norms of ethical citizenship. After all, preaching is communication oriented to Indonesians in a specific context, namely the context created in their routines of Islamic worship and learning. The authors provide an overview of social and political contexts for Islamic preaching, and examine the norms and rules that currently constrain preaching, referring both to Islamic norms as well as Indonesia’s positive law. The paper’s recommendations confirm the appropriateness of the low level of regulation traditionally applied to Islamic preachers, and encourage the government to be more sensitive to the ways in which the policies of Indonesian governments provide models for preachers about how the nation’s diversity should be treated in public communication.

The Discipline of Dakwah in Indonesia’s State Education System

“…These dakwah programmes have since been sustained by local participation as well as transnational networks, and their activists have taken an oppositional stance towards government policy. Since those discussions of the late 1960s, tension between the ministry's academics and 'private' dakwah operators has been an ongoing feature of public discourse, as has an enduring debate about the wisdom of state regulation of dakwah (Millie, Syarif and Fakhruroji 2019).…”

“…The recent polarization of Islamic authority in Indonesia has seen tensions arise around this need to subsume particular affiliations. In October of 2019, Abdul Somad Batubara (b. 1977, an academic employed at the Sultan Syarif Kasim State Islamic University (uin) in Indonesia's Riau province, was compelled to resign from his post.…”

Da'wah Policy Controversy: A Case Study of Discourse on Standardization and Certification of Da'i in Indonesia

“…State legality for the preacher is the main prerequisite, where the preacher is a figure selected and registered by the state (Millie et al, 2019). The consequences carried out by the state are in the form of assuming all the needs and financing of da'wah activities, both from infrastructure and facilities, including providing salaries for preachers.…”

Promoting moderate Islam in a global community through the ‘English for Ulama’ programme

“…The major goal of the moderate Islam project in terms of foreign policy is to build a new image of Indonesian Islam in a global context and to open doors for moderate Muslim countries and the global community (Sukma 2009). The Ministry of Religious Affairs also contributes to the moderate Islamic discourse by regulating religious preachers (Millie, Syarif & Fakhruroji 2020). However, the concept of moderate Islam is not new; several Indonesian Islamic scholars, such as Taher (1997), have advanced a similar idea through the concept of the middle path.…”