2019
DOI: 10.1002/arco.5202
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Island survival: The anthracological and archaeofaunal evidence for colonial‐era events on Barrow Island, north‐west Australia

Abstract: The establishment of north-west Australia's nineteenth-century pearlshell fisheries led to the first occupation of many arid offshore islands since the early mid-Holocene. The nature of this occupation, and how crews subsisted on such remote landscapes, remains poorly understood. We investigate a rare instance of an archaeobotanical and zooarchaeological record for this colonial-era activity at Bandicoot Bay, Barrow Island. Varied taxonomic representation suggests an atypical subsistence strategy for a maritim… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The site contained a large assemblage of glass artefacts that indicate a substantial amount of 'Kimberley Points' were manufactured there. This distinctive regional artefact type is produced by bifacial reduction/pressure flaking on stone and glass (Maloney 2015) and both provide direct evidence that Aboriginal people from the Kimberly had been brought to Barrow Island, consistent with accounts of 'blackbirding' (Paterson and Veth 2020), and offer a unique insight into the survival of these people while there (Byrne et al 2020). The points not only served functional uses as projectile points, but also occupied a significant cultural role for men and for engagement with masculinity (Akerman et al 2002;Harrison 2004a;Harrison 2006).…”
Section: {Fig 1 Near Here}mentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The site contained a large assemblage of glass artefacts that indicate a substantial amount of 'Kimberley Points' were manufactured there. This distinctive regional artefact type is produced by bifacial reduction/pressure flaking on stone and glass (Maloney 2015) and both provide direct evidence that Aboriginal people from the Kimberly had been brought to Barrow Island, consistent with accounts of 'blackbirding' (Paterson and Veth 2020), and offer a unique insight into the survival of these people while there (Byrne et al 2020). The points not only served functional uses as projectile points, but also occupied a significant cultural role for men and for engagement with masculinity (Akerman et al 2002;Harrison 2004a;Harrison 2006).…”
Section: {Fig 1 Near Here}mentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Research under the Barrow Island Archaeological Project (BIAP) has explored how, as part of a larger program throughout Britain antipodean colonies (see Furphy and Nettlebeck 2019), legislation purportedly introduced for the protection of Indigenous and non-European people served simultaneously to exploit them (Byrne et al 2020;Paterson 2017Paterson , 2018bPaterson and Veth 2020).…”
Section: {Fig 1 Near Here}mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using previously published peptide markers [ 66 ], two specimens were identified as Chelonia mydas (green sea turtle). While the presence of sea turtles at Bandicoot Bay was known from zooarchaeological investigations [ 15 , 54 ], the exact species was unknown. In addition, one Bandicoot Bay specimen was identified as Bovidae/Cervidae, fauna that are not present in the wild on Barrow Island.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chelonioidae (sea turtle), microfauna, bird, fish, crab and shark specimens were also identified [ 54 ]. Domesticated animals appear to be absent from the bone assemblage [ 15 , 54 ]. For the present study, 134 morphologically unidentifiable bone fragments from the Bandicoot Bay assemblage were sampled for ZooMS analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Working with Gooniyandi Traditional Owners Dilkes-Hall learned that Vitex glabrata calyces and endocarps were discarded by placing them in a pile next to the hearth rather than into the fire itself (Dilkes-Hall et al, 2019b). Cultural aversion to burning particular taxa and specific plant parts in campfires is not uncommon and has been documented elsewhere in relation to plants used for fuel (Byrne et al, 2013(Byrne et al, , 2019Whitau et al, 2017) and bone disposal (Gould, 1967;Walters, 1988). Oral traditions and historical documentation of Aboriginal use/s of species represented archaeologically assists interpretations of cultural use (e.g.…”
Section: Establishing the Source Of Macrobotanical Remainsmentioning
confidence: 99%