2021
DOI: 10.1109/access.2021.3091293
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Islanding Detection for Inverter-Based Distributed Generation Using Unsupervised Anomaly Detection

Abstract: Islanding detection with the rising grid supporting inverter-based distributed generation is becoming more critical protection due to its high droop gains and overall decreased system inertia leading to rapid changes in the electrical parameters. Traditional methods for islanding detection in this regard are susceptible to significant problems such as non-detection zone, false-positive detection, and inefficient mode of validation. Therefore, to attenuate these problems, this paper proposes a hybrid islanding … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The optimal gain K f is directly proportional to the quality factor of the load; however, when the quality factor is more than five, K f will be too large to create a false detection and can even cause system instability. The authors in [88] proposed a Q g −f droop curve method to keep K f to a safe value and monitor the change of frequency for islanding detection. During normal operation, the reactive power is controlled by the grid; however, during islanding operation, since the DG units operate at unity power factor and produce no reactive power, this creates a frequency difference between the actual and the rated system frequency.…”
Section: Hybrid Sandia Frequency Shift and Q G −F Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The optimal gain K f is directly proportional to the quality factor of the load; however, when the quality factor is more than five, K f will be too large to create a false detection and can even cause system instability. The authors in [88] proposed a Q g −f droop curve method to keep K f to a safe value and monitor the change of frequency for islanding detection. During normal operation, the reactive power is controlled by the grid; however, during islanding operation, since the DG units operate at unity power factor and produce no reactive power, this creates a frequency difference between the actual and the rated system frequency.…”
Section: Hybrid Sandia Frequency Shift and Q G −F Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This works by combining the rate of change of frequency and voltage methods to detect islanding [88]. The rate of change of voltage and the rate of change of frequency at the PCC are monitored as a first step to detect if one of them exceeds the predefined threshold to indicate islanding might have occurred.…”
Section: Voltage Fluctuation Injectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The existing approaches confronted the islanding detection problem in modern grid-tied networks in a comprehensive manner. However, the existing research has some limitations: (i) Noisy measurements are not considered in some of the existing islanding detection schemes [15,36]; (ii) some of the islanding detection strategies have a very high computational burden [22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33]; (iii) threshold setting in some schemes is difficult to implement [15,21]; and (iv) NDZ is large in few passive schemes, especially during low power miss-match moreover, some islanding detection indexes get failed [17,20].…”
Section: Limitations Of Existing Schemesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The index was developed based on the rate of change of frequency (ROCOF) of the DG. The authors in [15] presented an unsupervised anomaly detection to detect islanding events in the distribution network. The ROCOF and the phase angle of the voltage/current were used as the first and second detection parameter respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the fault occurs on the utility grid side which is outside of the PCC and then DER remains supplied to the fault along with the utility grid [96]. During external fault (islanding) conditions, islanding detection should occur and the microgrid should be isolated from the utility grid area through PCC because fault current flowing in the reverse direction from the microgrid DER towards the fault point which is located at the utility grid area to protect the microgrid equipment [97], [98].…”
Section: ) Islanding Conditionmentioning
confidence: 99%