2019
DOI: 10.1109/jsyst.2018.2889981
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Islanding Detection of Synchronous Generator-Based DGs using Rate of Change of Reactive Power

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As mentioned before, V q and I q are zero since the GCPVSs work at unity power factor in normal operating conditions. By combining (11) and (12), the maximum limit of disturbance gain is derived as…”
Section: Upper Limit Of K Vmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As mentioned before, V q and I q are zero since the GCPVSs work at unity power factor in normal operating conditions. By combining (11) and (12), the maximum limit of disturbance gain is derived as…”
Section: Upper Limit Of K Vmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These variations could stimulate under/over voltage, under/over frequency, and rate of change of frequency (ROCOF) relays as the early passive IDMs [7][8][9]. Several new algorithms which exploit the DG's or PCC electrical quantities have also been reported in [10][11][12][13][14]. The ratio of the equivalent resistance to the angular velocity of synchronousbased DG (SDG) at PCC has been proposed by Bekhradian et al [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These methods are more efficient in detecting islanding phenomenon compared to the OUV/F method appropriate to the rapid islanding detection and smaller NDZ [10]. Nowadays, a lot of researchers extend attentions to the utilization of the ROCORP method entitled to the easiness and efficiency in which can be further comprehend in [18], [19]. Nonetheless, the NDZ area for ROCOP is still big if the method is utilized without integration with other methods.…”
Section: A Over/under Voltage (Ouv) and Over/under Frequency (Ouf)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be noted that, the realized factors by the various IDSs have been highlighted in Table 1. For instance, some of these IDSs are thoroughly discussed below. Although, some of the factors include the DT, SBDG independency, and cost of implementation have been realized by the proposed IDS in Reference 6 the NDZ value is not removed completely and mal‐operation during some islanding and GCD events is quite probable. The introduced method in Reference 8 due to using the reactive power parameter can quickly detects the occurred events as well as its implementation is quite simple and cost‐effective. However, the NDZ value is noticeable and its operation is dependent on the SBDG operating conditions (eg, power factor value) as well as it may sends wrong tripping command to SBDG during some GCD events. The suggested IDS by Reference 18 can immediately and reliably without any NDZ value recognizes all the happened events as well as does not require extra devices to implementation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%