2015
DOI: 10.1080/23257962.2015.1058245
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

‘Isn’t it information assets we’re really talking about?’ A discourse analysis of a panel discussion on digital archives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The study conducted by Klareld (2015) found that the preservation of paper records is ensured by proper storage facilities. This statement is alluded to by Moatlhodi and Ramokate (2009) who found that most of the archival institutions build a sizable archival collection dated back as 1878 in Botswana Digital records are stored and preserved in ERMS.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study conducted by Klareld (2015) found that the preservation of paper records is ensured by proper storage facilities. This statement is alluded to by Moatlhodi and Ramokate (2009) who found that most of the archival institutions build a sizable archival collection dated back as 1878 in Botswana Digital records are stored and preserved in ERMS.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The public sector as a whole is struggling with digital transformation and e-government policies of efficiency, transparency, productivity, availability and high quality service (Persson and Goldkuhl, 2010). This challenges traditional conceptions of archives formation based on paper thinking with its tangible and stable format and appearance (Kallberg, 2013;Klareld and Gidlund, 2017;Runardotter et al, 2011). A change in responsibility for archives formation from archivists to IT professionals has followed digital transformation (Kallberg, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…How to scope, what to include in archives and how to appraise records is a recurring discussion connected to increased masses of records resulting from changes in technology (Ridener, 2009). During the past 20 years of the twentieth century until the present, the development of information and communication technology (ICT) has raised a renewed discussion on the role of archives and methods for records appraisal (Eastwood, 2017;Foscarini, 2017;Kallberg, 2012;Klareld, 2015;Klareld and Gidlund, 2017). One problem identified is residual paper thinking among archivists in the digitally transformed environment, as if the prerequisites for control and authenticity, and for manifold access and usability were still more or less the same (Cook, 1994;Klareld and Gidlund, 2017;Runardotter et al, 2011, p. 74).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This paper is part of a research project focusing on how ongoing developments affect recordkeeping in the public sector. Previous studies have explored how the concept of the "middle archive" is defined and explained (Klareld, 2015b); discourse types used when decision makers talk about changes needed to promote e-archives supporting digital work processes (Klareld, 2015a); how the decision to create a national e-archive relates to existing legislation (Klareld, 2015c); how the concept of the e-archive is illustrated and interpreted (Klareld and Gidlund, 2017); and what recordkeeping issues employees at a public agency see as relevant for discussion in relation to an outsourcing policy (Klareld, 2016).…”
Section: Casementioning
confidence: 99%