ISO 26000, 7 Grundsätze, 6 Kernthemen

Schmiedeknecht, Maud; Wieland, Josef

doi:10.1007/978-3-662-43483-3_20

Cited by 9 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…1 Many media articles have described it as an attempt to sugarcoat the social ills of digitalization through simple declarations of intent. Interestingly, the statement of these business representatives does not even mention the much more concrete international standard ISO 26000 on Corporate Social Responsibility (Schmiedeknecht and Wieland 2015), which was adopted 10 years ago. Digitalization requires many corporate leaders to demonstrate, among other things, the responsible handling of personal data.…”

Section: Companies and Business Leaders Want To Satisfy Their Stakeholdersmentioning

confidence: 99%

Ethics or Quality of Life?

Österle

2021

Perspectives on Digital Humanism

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Governmental and non-governmental organizations around the world are trying to shape socio-technical development, especially the use of information technology, for the benefit of people. They are developing ethical guidelines for the creation and evaluation of digital services. The discipline of Life Engineering must combine the knowledge of several disciplines, such as psychology, machine learning, economics, and ethics, so that technology serves people, i.e., contributes to well-being. Therefore, a solid understanding of quality of life should be the starting point, explaining the patterns of human behavior and their impact on well-being. Digital services of all kinds provide increasingly detailed digital twins and give us the opportunity to operationalize ethical principles.

show abstract

Section: Companies and Business Leaders Want To Satisfy Their Stakeholdersmentioning

confidence: 99%

Ethics or Quality of Life?

Österle

2021

Perspectives on Digital Humanism

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Or, to express it from another perspective: Evolution does not serve the purpose of humans; instead humans serve the purpose of evolution. Companies today use highly differentiated knowledge to encourage people to satisfy their short-term needs (hedonia), but could also aim at long-term satisfaction (eudaimonia), as corporate social responsibility [8] tries to do. Politicians discuss the symptoms, e.g.…”

Section: Quality Of Lifementioning

confidence: 99%

Life engineering

Österle

2020

Electron Markets

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper is a call for a discipline Life Engineering. For more than fifty years, Business Engineering (initially referred to as systems analysis) has been concerned with the use of information technology for the benefit of companies and other organizations, for example through electronic markets. In the past twenty years, machine intelligence has increasingly changed human life, while science offers little help in controlling change for the good of mankind.

show abstract

“…As a consequence, the relationship between businesses and public actors is changing and growing more complex (cf. Schmiedeknecht and Wieland 2012 ). It is no longer only limited to business compliance with government rules, but also includes co-governance and shared responsibility, for example by creating and implementing soft law.…”

Section: Modern Corporate Responsibility Is Differentmentioning

confidence: 99%

Creating Shared Value. A Fundamental Critique

Beschorner

Hajduk

2017

Ethical Economy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article offers a fundamental critique of Michael Porter's and Marc Kramer's "Creating Shared Value" (CSV) concept. First, the authors summarise the positive and negative criticism which CSV has received since 2011. They then show that CSV falls short of a modern understanding of corporate responsibility which is centred on more adequate ideas about the relationship between business and society. The article concludes with critical comments on the role of scholars in their interaction with practitioners. The following contribution is a translation of the article "Creating Shared Value: Eine Grundsatzkritik" (2015), published in the Zeitschrift für Wirtschafts-und Unternehmensethik (zfwu) 16 (2): 219-230.

show abstract

ISO 26000, 7 Grundsätze, 6 Kernthemen

Cited by 9 publications

References 0 publications

Ethics or Quality of Life?

Ethics or Quality of Life?

Life engineering

Creating Shared Value. A Fundamental Critique

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About