2009
DOI: 10.1002/csr.211
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

‘ISO‐lating’ corporate social responsibility in the organizational context: a dissenting interpretation of ISO 26000

Abstract: Sustainable development is frequently an object of standardization, and over 100 000 organizations hold ISO 14001 certifi cates proving they have legitimate environmental management systems. Guidelines for social responsibility are now the object of standardization, resulting in the upcoming ISO 26000 standard. This paper examines the rationale behind developing ISO 26000, highlighting the tendency to decouple complex CSR issues in the organizational context. This is relevant to current problems of poor workin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
64
0
3

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
64
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, formal procedural measures to obtain legitimacy from external stakeholders, such as ISO 14001 and ISO 26000 certifications, may backfire if they are decoupled from real sustainable development (Schwarz and Tilling, 2009). If NGOs start monitoring a company in response to the larger visibility of the environmental policies of the company, they might identify this gap and criticize the company for not meeting the expectations raised by the ISO 14001 or ISO 26000 certification.…”
Section: J Graafland Business Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, formal procedural measures to obtain legitimacy from external stakeholders, such as ISO 14001 and ISO 26000 certifications, may backfire if they are decoupled from real sustainable development (Schwarz and Tilling, 2009). If NGOs start monitoring a company in response to the larger visibility of the environmental policies of the company, they might identify this gap and criticize the company for not meeting the expectations raised by the ISO 14001 or ISO 26000 certification.…”
Section: J Graafland Business Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In their article "ISO-lating" Corporate Social Responsibility in the Organizational Context: A Dissenting Interpretation of ISO 26000', Birgitta Schwartz and Karina Tilling critically examine the development of ISO 26000, a world wide standard for CSR of the International Standardization Organization (ISO) (Schwartz et al, 2009). Standardization and transnational regulation occur in many fields and take place between and across nations in a world of blurring boundaries (Djelic et al, 2006).…”
Section: This Special Issue On Corporate Social Responsibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the rapid growth in the number of academic works in this field [12], the corporate ESG and financial implications of the implementation of the UNGC remain under-investigated [1,13,14]. To address this issue, this work aims to investigate whether the firms' commitment to the UNGC has an influence on companies' ESG and financial performances.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%