2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.rcim.2021.102206
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Iso-scallop tool path planning for triangular mesh surfaces in multi-axis machining

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A comparative test is proceeded to further elucidate the proposed method's benefits. Hereinto, two widely-used methods are introduced: (a) the end milling method with an iso-scallop height using ball-nosed cutters (Liang et al, 2021), and (b) the flank milling method with an iso-scallop height using drum-type cutters (Lu et al, 2022). For the two benchmarks, both u and v surface patch borders are used as the principal tool path.…”
Section: Comparison With the State-of-the-art Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A comparative test is proceeded to further elucidate the proposed method's benefits. Hereinto, two widely-used methods are introduced: (a) the end milling method with an iso-scallop height using ball-nosed cutters (Liang et al, 2021), and (b) the flank milling method with an iso-scallop height using drum-type cutters (Lu et al, 2022). For the two benchmarks, both u and v surface patch borders are used as the principal tool path.…”
Section: Comparison With the State-of-the-art Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To realize the toolpath re-planning to smooth and desensitize the most sensitive axis, there are two problems to be solved, one is how to plan the CCP path to complete the material removal precisely and the other is how to plan the tool orientation to avoid collision and make the sensitive axis of the machine tool move smoother [12]. However, many more mature methods have been proposed from the perspective of CCP planning, and the planning method of reciprocal CCP path is already very reasonable for blade machining [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20]. Therefore, this paper takes unchanging CCPs as the constraint and takes the desensitizing of the most sensitive axis as the target to replan the tool orientation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tool path planning methods can be briefly classified into two categories: topological and parametric. Methods based on a topological form mainly include direction parallel methods [27,28], contour parallel methods [29][30][31][32][33], and space-filling curve methods [34][35][36][37][38]. Methods based on a parametric form mainly include iso-parametric methods [39,40], iso-plane methods [41,42], iso-scallop height methods [43][44][45][46], and vector field-based methods [47][48][49][50][51].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%