2020
DOI: 10.1101/2020.03.30.015487
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Isobaric matching between runs and novel PSM-level normalization in MaxQuant strongly improve reporter ion-based quantification

Abstract: Isobaric labeling has the promise of combining high sample multiplexing with precise quantification. However, normalization issues and the missing value problem of complete n-plexes hamper quantification across more than one n-plex. Here we introduce two novel algorithms implemented in MaxQuant that substantially improve the data analysis with multiple n-plexes. First, isobaric matching between runs (IMBR) makes use of the three-dimensional MS1 features to transfer identifications from identified to unidentifi… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…MBR was recently extended from label‐free analysis to isobaric labeled experiments and is integrated in the newest MaxQuant version. Isobaric MBR transfers identifications after recalibration of mass and RT via 3D MS1 features, to MS/MS spectra that were previously not identified and then uses their reporter ion intensities for quantification 89 . MBR is exceptionally effective in boosting identification numbers and overcome stochastic sampling in DDA.…”
Section: Post‐processing and Data Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MBR was recently extended from label‐free analysis to isobaric labeled experiments and is integrated in the newest MaxQuant version. Isobaric MBR transfers identifications after recalibration of mass and RT via 3D MS1 features, to MS/MS spectra that were previously not identified and then uses their reporter ion intensities for quantification 89 . MBR is exceptionally effective in boosting identification numbers and overcome stochastic sampling in DDA.…”
Section: Post‐processing and Data Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[104] This problem makes it more difficult to compare RP abundance across different conditions. Advances relying on matching peptide intensity readouts, that is, MaxLFQ, [105] and on enhanced peptide identifications via DIA [94][95][96] or DDA methods incorporating retention time information [77,106,107] can mitigate the missing value problem when using label-free approaches.…”
Section: Control Of Biases At the Ms1-level Of Peptide Quantificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The samples for the example of UMAP analysis can be downloaded at PRIDE (PXD003710) (Bailey, McDevitt, Westphall, Pagliarini, & Coon, 2014). Additionally, the MaxQuant (Cox & Mann, 2008;Sinitcyn, Rudolph, & Cox, 2018;Yu, Kiriakidou, & Cox, 2020) proteinGroup table of this dataset is also provided at https:// github.com/ JurgenCox/ perseus-plugin-programming/ tree/ master/ dataset. The values are normalized and transformed by logarithm, and the unreliable protein groups (reversed, only identified by site, contaminant, containing more than 30%…”
Section: Input Filesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MaxQuant is one of the most commonly used software applications for mass‐spectrometry‐based proteomics data analysis. It can support numerous types of labeling strategies and MS platforms (Cox et al., 2014; Tyanova, Mann, & Cox, 2014; Yu et al., 2020). Moreover, different quantification methods, false‐discovery rate control, and visualization are also provided in MaxQuant.…”
Section: Commentarymentioning
confidence: 99%