2011
DOI: 10.1120/jacmp.v12i4.3645
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Isocenter verification for linac‐based stereotactic radiation therapy: review of principles and techniques

Abstract: There have been several manual, semi‐automatic and fully‐automatic methods proposed for verification of the position of mechanical isocenter as part of comprehensive quality assurance programs required for linear accelerator‐based stereotactic radiosurgery/radiotherapy (SRS/SRT) treatments. In this paper, a systematic review has been carried out to discuss the present methods for isocenter verification and compare their characteristics, to help physicists in making a decision on selection of their quality assu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
70
0
12

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
0
70
0
12
Order By: Relevance
“…The test was originally developed to use very complicated film-based measurements that were dependent on the observer's measurement skill [1], but it later progressed to electronic portal imaging device (EPID)-based measurements that were easy to obtain using commercial software. This had become easy implemented after Rowshanfarzad et al wrote a broad review of the test [10] and Childress et al delineated a practical method to perform an EPID-based Winston-Lutz test in linear accelerator systems [11]. However, the standard Winston-Lutz test focuses only on the machine isocenter; it cannot accurately determine whether the center of the mechanical field (which is represented by the light field) and the center of the radiation field coincide when both are off from the isocenter (i.e., an asymmetric field).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The test was originally developed to use very complicated film-based measurements that were dependent on the observer's measurement skill [1], but it later progressed to electronic portal imaging device (EPID)-based measurements that were easy to obtain using commercial software. This had become easy implemented after Rowshanfarzad et al wrote a broad review of the test [10] and Childress et al delineated a practical method to perform an EPID-based Winston-Lutz test in linear accelerator systems [11]. However, the standard Winston-Lutz test focuses only on the machine isocenter; it cannot accurately determine whether the center of the mechanical field (which is represented by the light field) and the center of the radiation field coincide when both are off from the isocenter (i.e., an asymmetric field).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rising interest in frame‐less stereotactic radiotherapy to body sites with image guidance has presented new challenges for quality assurance of linear accelerators. The requirement of placing high‐dose gradients in extreme proximity to critical structures, such as stereotactic radiotherapy of spine malignancies and the spinal cord, 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 has resulted in more stringent AAPM guidelines for treatment accuracy and the development of precision methods to characterize performance (26) …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, projection images of the phantom are acquired and discrepancy between radiation and mechanical isocenter is reported whenever the center of the ball -as projected onto detector plane -deviates from the center of the radiation field. Measurements are repeated for a few angular positions of a gantry of a therapeutic device (Rowshanfarzad et al, 2011).…”
Section: Niedźwiecki M Et Al: Quality Assurance In Radiotherapymentioning
confidence: 99%