2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2022.105766
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Isoform requirement of clustered protocadherin for preventing neuronal apoptosis and neonatal lethality

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While our data suggest that Pcdhγ diversity is dispensable for cIN survival, the diversity requirements for clustered Pcdhs in the Pcdha and Pcdhb clusters was not studied here: in all genotypes examined, these clusters remained intact. A recent study found that mutant mice lacking all call Pcdha, Pcdhb , and A- and B-type Pcdhg genes (thus retaining only Pcdhγc3, Pcdhγc4, and Pcdhγc5), also exhibited neonatal lethality and increased neuronal apoptosis (Kobayashi et al, 2023). These results are consistent with previous reports showing that Pcdhγc4 (uniquely among Pcdhγ isoforms) requires other “carrier” cPcdhs to be transported to the cell-surface (Thu et al 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While our data suggest that Pcdhγ diversity is dispensable for cIN survival, the diversity requirements for clustered Pcdhs in the Pcdha and Pcdhb clusters was not studied here: in all genotypes examined, these clusters remained intact. A recent study found that mutant mice lacking all call Pcdha, Pcdhb , and A- and B-type Pcdhg genes (thus retaining only Pcdhγc3, Pcdhγc4, and Pcdhγc5), also exhibited neonatal lethality and increased neuronal apoptosis (Kobayashi et al, 2023). These results are consistent with previous reports showing that Pcdhγc4 (uniquely among Pcdhγ isoforms) requires other “carrier” cPcdhs to be transported to the cell-surface (Thu et al 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This observation could be explained by non-mutually exclusive scenarios: 1) the formation of PcdhγC4 heterodimers, in cis , with members of Pcdha and/or Pcdhb clusters, providing cellular specificity important for cIN survival; and/or 2) that PcdhγC4 (uniquely among Pcdhγ isoforms) requires other clustered Pcdhs to be transported to the cell surface ( 46 ). While the mutant mice used by Kobayahsi et al (45) retain PcdhγC3 and PcdhγC5, these isoforms are expressed at low levels in cINs. In addition, it has been shown that cis -interactions among C-type Pcdhγs are weak and this may prevent PcdhγC3 and PcdhγC5 from functioning as carriers for PcdhγC4 ( 47 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…While our data suggest that Pcdhγ diversity is dispensable for cIN survival, the Pcdha and Pcdhb gene clusters remained intact and these Pcdhs could have contributed to diversity. A recent study found that mutant mice lacking all Pcdha, Pcdhb, and A- and B-type Pcdhγ genes (thus retaining only PcdhγC3, PcdhγC4, and PcdhγC5), also exhibited neonatal lethality and increased neuronal apoptosis ( 45 ) . This observation could be explained by non-mutually exclusive scenarios: 1) the formation of PcdhγC4 heterodimers, in cis , with members of Pcdha and/or Pcdhb clusters, providing cellular specificity important for cIN survival; and/or 2) that PcdhγC4 (uniquely among Pcdhγ isoforms) requires other clustered Pcdhs to be transported to the cell surface ( 46 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Excessive spinal interneuron apoptosis preceding neonatal lethality in mice lacking all 22 Pcdhg genes indicates the importance of these molecules in organismal survival (Lefebvre et al, 2008; Mancia Leon et al, 2024; Prasad et al, 2008; Wang et al, 2002). In the CNS, loss of all γ-Pcdhs or disruption of normal γ-Pcdh repertoire consistently leads to disrupted neurodevelopment, including reduced dendritic arborization, loss of dendrite and axon self-avoidance, aberrant axon coalescence, and/or altered synapse formation/maturation depending upon the neuronal cell type (Garrett et al, 2012; Garrett & Weiner, 2009; Ing-Esteves et al, 2018; Kobayashi et al, 2023; Kostadinov & Sanes, 2015; Lefebvre et al, 2012; Molumby et al, 2017; Molumby et al, 2016; Mountoufaris et al, 2017; Prasad & Weiner, 2011; Steffen et al, 2021; Weiner et al, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%