2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.apm.2020.07.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Isogeometric analysis for non-classical Bernoulli-Euler beam model incorporating microstructure and surface energy effects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Altenbach and Eremeyev [17] derived the governing equations for thin shells by including surface energy effects and determined effective stiffness constants of a linear elastic Cosserat shell accounting for surface stress contributions. Non-classical models for Bernoulli-Euler beams, Timoshenko beams, shear deformation beams, Kirchhoff plates, Mindlin plates, Love-Kirchhoff shells, and shear deformation shells have recently been developed in [8,10,[18][19][20][21][22][23] by incorporating microstructure and surface energy effects. Non-classical models for thin rods including microstructure effects have also been provided using couple stress, micropolar and non-local elasticity theories [24][25][26][27][28][29][30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Altenbach and Eremeyev [17] derived the governing equations for thin shells by including surface energy effects and determined effective stiffness constants of a linear elastic Cosserat shell accounting for surface stress contributions. Non-classical models for Bernoulli-Euler beams, Timoshenko beams, shear deformation beams, Kirchhoff plates, Mindlin plates, Love-Kirchhoff shells, and shear deformation shells have recently been developed in [8,10,[18][19][20][21][22][23] by incorporating microstructure and surface energy effects. Non-classical models for thin rods including microstructure effects have also been provided using couple stress, micropolar and non-local elasticity theories [24][25][26][27][28][29][30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the recent years, Zhao et.al [25] presented a new Bernoulli-Euler beam model based on modified gradient elasticity, Yin et. al [26] did isogeometric analysis for non-classical Bernoulli-Euler beam model incorporating microstructure and surface energy effects, Esen [27] investigated size-dependent Timoshenko microbeams subjected to a moving load, and Chen [28] et.al reformulated microbeams by incorporating the general strain gradient elasticity theory. Also some studies modeled microbeams including functionally graded material [29][30][31][32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zhang et al [88] studied the response of Timoshenko nanobeams accounting for the effects of couple stress and surface energy. Yin et al [89] studied the microstructure and surface energy effects on the deflection and free vibration of homogeneous Euler-Bernoulli nanobeams using isogeometric analysis. Regarding TFG small scale beams, the coupled effects of microstructure, residual surface stress, and surface elasticity on the size-depedent mechanics of elastic and viscoelastic TFG nanobeams was investigated [90][91][92][93][94][95].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%