1989
DOI: 10.1016/0039-6028(89)90658-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Isolated indium atoms on copper surfaces: A perturbed γ-γ angular correlation study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

4
37
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
4
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The electric field gradient at a surface is a result of the broken symmetry of the solid at the surface and therefore it depends on the surface orientation. This is confirmed by the results of Klas et al [6].…”
Section: Application Of Time Dif Ferential Perturbed Angular Correlatsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The electric field gradient at a surface is a result of the broken symmetry of the solid at the surface and therefore it depends on the surface orientation. This is confirmed by the results of Klas et al [6].…”
Section: Application Of Time Dif Ferential Perturbed Angular Correlatsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…However, some deviations from the linear dependence of the electric field gradient at a surface have been observed for 111In on Cu (100) [6].…”
Section: Application Of Time Dif Ferential Perturbed Angular Correlatmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We emphasize that the sample preparation is done with 111m Cd or 111 In, whereas the hyperfine interaction measurement applying PAC (explicitly described in Ref. [8] with respect to surface experiments) is performed with the decay product 111 Cd. On a ferromagnetic surface, the probe nuclei with the nuclear magnetic moment m g N m N (g N is the nuclear g factor; m N is the nuclear magneton) interact with the magnetic hyperfine field B hf , and with the nuclear electric quadrupole moment Q N , they interact with the electric field gradient (EFG).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A distinction of the different fractions is obtained by the observation of their increase and decrease with increasing temperature. By this we follow a well established procedure for the same PAC probe with measured EFGs on similar surfaces, e.g., Ni(111) [2,12]; Cu(111), Cu(001) [8]; Pd(111) [14], Pd(001) [15]. At room temperature, the probes are incorporated into steps or even into the terraces.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%