2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.12.050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Isolated Lumbar Extensor Strengthening Versus Regular Physical Therapy in an Army Working Population With Nonacute Low Back Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Abstract: Consistent with prior evidence, specific back strengthening does not seem to offer incremental benefits in LBP management compared with regular PT care that mainly consists of general exercise therapy. (ISRCTN identifier ISRCTN19334317.)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
48
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Long-term benefits after RT intervention can be observed in patients with CLBP20 but also appear to be further influenced by extrinsic factors such as physical activity, smoking and treatment outcome expectations 21. Isolated data have suggested that RT offers no benefits over normal physical therapy in the treatment of CLBP;22 however, such conclusions are not supported by the majority of the current literature.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Long-term benefits after RT intervention can be observed in patients with CLBP20 but also appear to be further influenced by extrinsic factors such as physical activity, smoking and treatment outcome expectations 21. Isolated data have suggested that RT offers no benefits over normal physical therapy in the treatment of CLBP;22 however, such conclusions are not supported by the majority of the current literature.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…13 Ambiguous phrases which may or may not have been referring to serious pathologies were used in a further nine (18%) papers (see Table 2). Several of the studies we rated as ambiguous, referred to 'specific' [14][15][16][17][18][19] or exact diagnoses of LBP (Table 2). Six studies (12%) did not report any exclusion criteria for identifying patients with potential serious pathology.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14 Hernandez et al 15 Yakhno et al 16 Helmhout et al 17 Helmhout et al 19 Smeets et al 20 Inoue et al 21 Yelland et al 49 Yip et al 50 Chrubasik et al 51 Steenstra et al 52 Rasmussen et al 53 Preyde et al 54 Seferlis et al 55 Storheim et al 56 Lierz et al…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is obvious that the enlisted category is associated with a higher-than-average risk of disability related to the lumbar spine due to military tasks as repetitive lifting, frequent bending and twisting, pushing and pulling, and awkward body postures. 20 Nevertheless, an indisputable correlation between rank and physical workload has not been established yet.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%