2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2014.11.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Isolated single umbilical artery: evaluating the risk of adverse pregnancy outcome

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
26
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
3
26
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Tulek et al [11] analyzed birth weight and found that SGA was three-fold as likely in pregnancies with iSUA compared to pregnancies with TVC. Other recent studies also reported similar results [1317181920]. However, Bombrys et al [14] found that iSUA was not associated with a higher rate of SGA in comparison with newborns with TVC (13.7% vs. 13.9%, P =0.93).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Tulek et al [11] analyzed birth weight and found that SGA was three-fold as likely in pregnancies with iSUA compared to pregnancies with TVC. Other recent studies also reported similar results [1317181920]. However, Bombrys et al [14] found that iSUA was not associated with a higher rate of SGA in comparison with newborns with TVC (13.7% vs. 13.9%, P =0.93).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…1. Table 1 shows the characteristics of the 11 included studies [1112131415161718192021]. The studies comprised 3 case-control studies and 8 cohort studies.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…1,2,7,[8][9][10]13 A recent meta-analysis compiling data from four smaller case-control and three cohort studies did not find a significant association between SGA and an isolated single umbilical artery, whereas the largest retrospective study from Canada noted an association with birth weight less than the 10th and third percentiles as well as other adverse neonatal outcomes. 6,10 In our study, however, neonates with an isolated single umbilical artery weighed 284 g less at birth compared with the neonates in the control group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%