2017
DOI: 10.1002/alr.22023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Isolated sphenoid sinus opacifications: a systematic review and meta‐analysis

Abstract: ISSOs are caused by diverse pathologies. Given the considerable rates of neoplastic disease and cranial neuropathies, patients affected by an ISSO should be monitored closely and treated aggressively. Prompt surgical intervention, with either diagnostic or therapeutic intent, is often indicated.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
25
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
25
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Effect of sphenoid sinus volume and pneumatization type on isolated chronic sphenoid sinusitis (fungi and polyps). Tr-ENT 2020;30 (2):58-65.…”
Section: Citationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Effect of sphenoid sinus volume and pneumatization type on isolated chronic sphenoid sinusitis (fungi and polyps). Tr-ENT 2020;30 (2):58-65.…”
Section: Citationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[9] One meta-analysis on ISSDs indicated causes of sphenoid pathologies as follows: chronic sinusitis without polyps (28.3%), mucocele (20.3%), fungal sinusitis (12.5%), malignant neoplasm (7.7%), intracranial lesions (7.0%), benign neoplasm (5.7%), chronic sinusitis with polyps (3.4%), and other pathologies (4.7%). [2] Various studies on different populations have classified sphenoid pneumatization types under either three or four categories. Classifications with three categories are classified as conchal, presellar, and sellar.…”
Section: Citationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…25 To account for proportions with zero reported events, SE was estimated as the inverse of sample size as previously reported. 26 Meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model for the risk of occult nodal metastasis and subgroup analysis. The I 2 statistic was used to identify heterogeneity between studies.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%