2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.healun.2004.02.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Isolated Ventricular Non-Compaction in Adults With Idiopathic Cardiomyopathy: Cardiac Magnetic Resonance and Pathologic Characterization of the Anomaly

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
11
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
5
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These data are in agreement with previous CMR studies [6,7,11,14] and myocardial tissue samples [17,18] which confirmed the heterogeneous distribution of myocardial fibrosis in patients with LVNC.…”
Section: Cmr Imaging Findingssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…These data are in agreement with previous CMR studies [6,7,11,14] and myocardial tissue samples [17,18] which confirmed the heterogeneous distribution of myocardial fibrosis in patients with LVNC.…”
Section: Cmr Imaging Findingssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Because of its better spatial resolution, CMR detected pronounced trabeculations and recesses that are compatible with LVNC. The better diagnostic utility of CMR as compared with echocardiography has been reported previously [5]. It is generally thought that LVNC leads to a progressive dilated cardiomyopathy but our case suggests that LVNC can be either reversible or may have a dynamic course, or that current morphological criteria occasionally allow to misclassify a transient cardiomyopathy as noncompaction.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 50%
“…Additional morphological consideration for diagnosis of LVNC that we have consistently noted in our lab, although not formally published, includes thinned compacted epicardial layers at the sites of non-compaction as previously described39 (Jenni et al 's criteria), as well as an abrupt transition from normal to ‘non-compacted’ segments (figure 2, C1–2). However, beyond morphology, CMR provides opportunities for more comprehensive myocardial characterisation.…”
Section: Cardiovascular Imaging Criteriamentioning
confidence: 69%