2004
DOI: 10.1111/j.1601-5223.2001.00271.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Isolation and Characterization of Microsatellite Markers from the Endangered Karner Blue Butterfly Lycaeides Melissa Samuelis (Lepidoptera)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Observations of excess homozygosity and null homozygote individuals at these novel loci further support this hypothesis. Interestingly, significant homozygote excess has also been noted in all other reports of butterfly microsatellites (P alo et al 1995; M eglécz and Solignac 1998; H arper et al 2000; A nthony et al 2001). Thus, high variability in the regions flanking microsatellite repeats may be widespread in butterflies and may contribute to the difficulty of microsatellite marker development in this group.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Observations of excess homozygosity and null homozygote individuals at these novel loci further support this hypothesis. Interestingly, significant homozygote excess has also been noted in all other reports of butterfly microsatellites (P alo et al 1995; M eglécz and Solignac 1998; H arper et al 2000; A nthony et al 2001). Thus, high variability in the regions flanking microsatellite repeats may be widespread in butterflies and may contribute to the difficulty of microsatellite marker development in this group.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 62%
“…Unfortunately, progress in this area has been hampered by the difficulty of isolating useful microsatellite markers from butterfly genomes (M eglécz and Solignac 1998; K eyghobadi et al 1999; N ève and Meglécz 2000). Very few microsatellite loci have been reported for butterflies or in fact for any Lepidoptera ( Palo et al 1995; B ogdanowicz et al 1997; M eglécz and Solignac 1998; K eyghobadi et al 1999; R eddy et al 1999; H arper et al 2000; A nthony et al 2001) and isolation and characterization of microsatellite markers is clearly more difficult in these insects than in most other organisms (M eglécz and Solignac 1998; N ève and Meglécz 2000). Here, we describe four novel microsatellite loci useful for population studies in the butterfly, Parnassius smintheus (Doubleday).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequently, we scored these SNPs by visualizing PCR products on 2% agarose gels following digestion with Taq α 1 and Hin dIII for gapdh and inv respectively. The four microsatellite markers we amplified were Msat4, Msat6, MsatZ12 and Msat201, which were designed from a L. melissa genomic DNA library (Anthony et al. 2001) and were known to be polymorphic within and among L. melissa and L. idas populations (Anthony et al.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PCR coamplification of fragments primed at [1 microsatellite locus often occur due to the presence of multilocus microsatellites (microsatellite families) that share nucleotide sequence similarity at genome regions that flank the tandem repeat (Zhang 2004;Meglécz et al 2004; Van't Hof et al 2007). Difficulties are encountered because alleles that originate from independently segregating loci typically are scored, and render genetic markers unsuitable for population or linkage analysis (Anthony et al 2001;Fauvelot et al 2006;Anderson et al 2007). Microsatellite families are known among insect species (Meglécz et al 2007), but appear pronounced within lepidopteran species due to a yet undescribed common ancestry that is shared among genomes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%