2020
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236518
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Isolation and characterization of thermophilic cellulose and hemicellulose degrading bacterium, Thermoanaerobacterium sp. R63 from tropical dry deciduous forest soil

Abstract: Thermophilic microorganisms and their enzymes have been utilized in various industrial applications. In this work, we isolated and characterized thermophilic anaerobic bacteria with the cellulose and hemicellulose degrading activities from a tropical dry deciduous forest in northern Thailand. Out of 502 isolated thermophilic anaerobic soil bacteria, 6 isolates, identified as Thermoanaerobacterium sp., displayed an ability to utilize a wide range of oligosaccharides and lignocellulosic substrates. The isolates … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The optimal temperature of Cel1029 is slightly higher than that of Lp-egl-1 from Lyrodus pedicellatus (Hiroshi et al 2008) and PersiCel1 from camel rumen metagenome ). On the basis of hot activity, Cel1029 outperforms PersiCel2 with about 10% activity at 80°C , but is worse than R63 from Thermoanaerobacterium sp with about 80% activity at 75°C, (Harnvoravongchai et al 2020) and PW2 from Bacillus sp. with 100% activity at 80°C (Divyanshi et al 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The optimal temperature of Cel1029 is slightly higher than that of Lp-egl-1 from Lyrodus pedicellatus (Hiroshi et al 2008) and PersiCel1 from camel rumen metagenome ). On the basis of hot activity, Cel1029 outperforms PersiCel2 with about 10% activity at 80°C , but is worse than R63 from Thermoanaerobacterium sp with about 80% activity at 75°C, (Harnvoravongchai et al 2020) and PW2 from Bacillus sp. with 100% activity at 80°C (Divyanshi et al 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Therefore, the observed isolates are thermophilic bacteria ( Simandjuntak and Mokosuli, 2018 ). Furthermore, the soil waste sample from which thermophilic bacteria was isolated was high and consistedof organic materials; thus, bacteria isolated from such places may have better potential to produce critical industrial compounds under adverse conditions ( Harnvoravongchai et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Determining the hydrolysis capacity (H.C.) value is more feasible for screening the degrading bacteria in large sample volumes than an enzymatic assay ( Harnvoravongchai et al, 2020 ). The clear zones on the different mediums were used to conduct qualitative testing of extracellular enzyme-producing bacteria.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the crude enzymes of strain BUFF exhibited up to 100-fold greater xylanase activity than that reported in T. xylanolyticum strain B6A-RI (0.065 U/mg) and T. brockii strain HTD4 (0.003 U/ mg) [38]. In the genus Thermoanaerobacterium, strains equipped with multi-enzymatic systems capable of digesting lignocellulose are also described; a thermophilic anaerobic bacterium, Thermoanaerobacterium thermosaccharolyticum strain NOI-1 when grown on xylan showed a multienzyme complex consisting of xylanase, β-xylosidase, α-L-arabinofuranosidase, β-glucosidase and cellobiohydrolase [40,41].…”
Section: Enzyme Production Of T Thermostercoris In Selected Growth Mediamentioning
confidence: 99%