“…Accordingly, the intact fullerene cage is generated by combining one half of the cage with the mirror image of the Notably, the fullerene cages for U@C 84 and U@C 86 (I) are not the same IPR isomers found for the previously reported Sm@D 3d (19)-C 84 , 24 Sm@C 2 (13)-C 84 , 24 Eu@D 3d (19)-C 84 , 25 Eu@C 2 (13)-C 84 , 14 Eu@C 2 (11)-C 84 , 14 Yb@C 2 (13)-C 84 , 26 Lu 2 @C 2v (7)-C 84 , 27 Lu 2 @D 2d (23)-C 84 , 28 Sc 2 C 2 @D 2d (23)-C 84 , 29 Eu@C 1 (7)-C 86 , 14 Lu 2 @C s (8)-C 86 , 27 Lu 2 @C 2v (9)-C 86 , 28 Lu 2 C 2 @C 2v (9)-C 86 , 27 Sc 2 C 2 @C 2v (9)-C 86 , 19 Gd 3 N@D 3 (19)-C 86 , 30 Tb 3 N@D 3 (19)-C 86 , 31 and Lu 3 N@D 3 (19)-C 86 . 32 Analysis of cage connectivity identified U@C 84 as U@D 2 (21)-C 84 and U@C 86 (I) as U@C s (15)-C 86 , the same C s (15)-C 86 was only reported for Lu 2 @C s (15)-C 86 previously. 27 It is important to note that D 2 (21)-C 84 is a totally new chiral cage, for which we observe the two enantiomers (cage 1 and cage 1A), see Figure S4.…”