2013
DOI: 10.17795/ijep9416
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Isolation and Determination of Antibiotic Resistance Patterns in Non-typhoid Salmonella spp isolated from chicken

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
13
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
5
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, high antimicrobial resistance rates were found against nalidixic acid (92.8%), tetracycline (81%), trimethoprim (68.4%), sulfamethoxazole / trimethoprim (61.2%), streptomycin (56.7%), and kanamycin (36.9%). As in the present study, resistance to the above antibiotics have also been frequently reported in a number of other investigations on poultry products in Iran and other countries [12,[18][19][20]28,32,36,[45][46][47][48]. The Salmonella resistance rates to nalidixic acid (92.8%) and tetracycline (81%) found in this study were higher than resistance rates to other antimicrobials because of the overuse of these antimicrobials for treatment and growth promotion in different fields.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…In this study, high antimicrobial resistance rates were found against nalidixic acid (92.8%), tetracycline (81%), trimethoprim (68.4%), sulfamethoxazole / trimethoprim (61.2%), streptomycin (56.7%), and kanamycin (36.9%). As in the present study, resistance to the above antibiotics have also been frequently reported in a number of other investigations on poultry products in Iran and other countries [12,[18][19][20]28,32,36,[45][46][47][48]. The Salmonella resistance rates to nalidixic acid (92.8%) and tetracycline (81%) found in this study were higher than resistance rates to other antimicrobials because of the overuse of these antimicrobials for treatment and growth promotion in different fields.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The results of this study were differ from Ruzauskas et al (2005) who reported that 8.1% were resistant to aminoglycosides (neomycin and gentamicin), also SOOMRO et al . (2010) observed that all the Salmonella isolates showed resistance to ampicillin, and sensitivity to streptomycin, cefotaxime, gentamicin, tobramycin and ciprofloxacin, the results were different from Fallah et al . (2013) who -169-observed that all isolates strains were sensitive to cefotaxime and 100% were resistant to nalidixic acid, tetracycline and streptomycin, also differ from Tessema et al .…”
Section: Serotypingmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Moreover Korashy and Mohammed (2012) revealed that 5 different serotypes were identified as S. typhimurium (42.9 %) , followed by S. enteritidis (21.4%) , S. virchow (21.4%) , S.anatum (7.1%) and Salmonella type II (7.1%), also Abd El-Tawab et al (2015) found that Salmonella isolates were serotyped as S. Fallah et al(2013) found that 34 of 44 isolates of Salmonella were Salmonella infantis (79.5 %), one strain (2.3%) of group C and 8 strains (18.2%) of group D, also Nidaullah et al(2017) found the predominant serovars were S. Albany (57/161), S. Corvallis (42/161), and S. Brancaster (37/161).…”
Section: Serotypingmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The susceptibility of the bacterial isolates to antimicrobial agents was carried out using the Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion method [15,16,17]. Commercially procured discs were used for this study.…”
Section: Antibiotic Susceptibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%