2011
DOI: 10.1637/9607-120510-case.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Isolation and Identification of Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza Virus Subtype H5N1 from Emus from the Ein Gedi Oasis by the Dead Sea

Abstract: An avian influenza virus (AIV), A/Emu/Israel/552/2010/(H5N1), was isolated from a dead emu that was found in the Ein Gedi oasis near the Dead Sea. The virus molecular characterization was performed by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and real-time RT-PCR using AIV subtype-specific primers. The virus was of high pathogenicity, according to its intravenous pathogenicity index of 2.85 and the nucleotide sequencing at the cleavage site of the hemagglutinin gene, GERRRKKR, which is typical f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The real‐time RT‐PCR has obvious advantages over classical virus isolation methods, including speed, labor reduction, and high throughput [Li et al, 2011]. However, virus isolation is the gold standard for diagnosis of virus infection and isolated strains of the virus could be used for further study of prevalence and variation [Amnon et al, 2011; El Zowalaty et al, 2011]. Both approaches therefore should be used according to their specific benefits.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The real‐time RT‐PCR has obvious advantages over classical virus isolation methods, including speed, labor reduction, and high throughput [Li et al, 2011]. However, virus isolation is the gold standard for diagnosis of virus infection and isolated strains of the virus could be used for further study of prevalence and variation [Amnon et al, 2011; El Zowalaty et al, 2011]. Both approaches therefore should be used according to their specific benefits.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the emu displaying a cell tropism that could be favourable to both avian and human influenza A strains, should this species be recognised as a possible mixing vessel for the emergence of novel IAV strains? Evidence shows that the emu can carry human and avian IAVs [ 60 ] and many viral HA and NA subtypes [ 61 , 62 , 63 , 65 , 66 ], supporting the contention that these birds could provide the host conditions to facilitate genetic reassortment and give rise to novel IAV strains.…”
Section: The Emu ( Dromaius Novaehollandiae ) Has Abundant Co-expression Of α-23 and α-26 Sialic Acid Receptors On Intmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Leigh Perkins and Swayne (2002) investigated the susceptibility of emus to the highly pathogenic H5N1 virus, demonstrating how intranasal inoculation with A/chicken/Hong Kong/220/97 (H5N1) induced a high level of morbidity but no mortality [ 61 ]. In 2010, a naturally occurring outbreak of HPAI H5N1 was detected in emus at an Israeli mini-zoo at the Ein Gedi oasis near the Dead Sea [ 66 ]. Interestingly, the authors postulated migratory birds as the source of infection since, at the time, Israel was free from H5 infections, there was no commercial poultry within a 12 km radius, and no new birds had been introduced in the previous six months.…”
Section: Dromaius Novaehollandiae Is Susceptible To a Variety Of Avian And Human Influenza A Viral Subtypes Including The Pandemmentioning
confidence: 99%