Plant Diseases Caused by Dickeya and Pectobacterium Species 2021
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-61459-1_5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Isolation, Detection and Characterization of Pectobacterium and Dickeya Species

Abstract: Article 25fa states that the author of a short scientific work funded either wholly or partially by Dutch public funds is entitled to make that work publicly available for no consideration following a reasonable period of time after the work was first published, provided that clear reference is made to the source of the first publication of the work.This publication is distributed under The Association of Universities in the Netherlands (VSNU) 'Article 25fa implementation' project. In this project research out… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 101 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several species-specific tools were developed for identifying and quantifying Dickeya and Pectobacterium pathogen species in plant samples, as well as for characterizing the collected bacterial isolates [ 11 ]. In this work, we mainly used a unique marker gapA for characterizing all the collected isolates from blackleg lesions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several species-specific tools were developed for identifying and quantifying Dickeya and Pectobacterium pathogen species in plant samples, as well as for characterizing the collected bacterial isolates [ 11 ]. In this work, we mainly used a unique marker gapA for characterizing all the collected isolates from blackleg lesions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From this knowledge in taxonomy and genomics, different molecular tools have been developed for pathogen diagnosis, hence for identifying and discarding the contaminated plant materials from the production process of certified seed potato tubers [ 11 ]. For instance, in France, a quality scheme was set up along production of tuber seeds from the in vitro propagation of potato varieties until tuber harvest in the field.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The practice of rogueing (the removal of diseased plants) of seed potatoes by farmers is recommended by the seed certification procedures as a key component in maintaining the health status of the crop. However, according to Van der Wolf et al (2021b), the efficacy of this method in controlling the spread of SRP bacteria is controversial since it does not always ensure sanitization of the entire crop (Bonde 1950;Pérombelon and Hyman 1992) as the tubers of the diseased plant will not be removed and still maintain an infection source. Boomsma et al (2013) tested the efficacy of rogueing experimentally in the Netherlands without conclusive results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are no potato cultivars available which are resistant to SRP, and no control agents are registered for treatment of plant material. Disease management in the European Union is predominantly based on the obligatory use of seed potatoes in which the disease is absent or only present in a low incidence (Van der Wolf et al 2021b). Currently, seed testing and certification is solely based on field inspections.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many PCR-based methods have already been developed for generalised and species-specific detection of SRP (reviewed in [ 16 , 17 ]). The accumulation of data on bacterial genomics and taxonomic redistributions has encouraged the design of an updated method for the specific diagnosis of newly established SRP species, particularly Ppa.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%