1993
DOI: 10.1007/bf00318742
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Isolation, identification and quantitative evaluation of specific cell types from the mammalian gastric mucosa

Abstract: Functional in vitro studies with isolated gastric mucosal cells require cytological identification of different cell types in suspension or primary culture. Since suitable techniques have not been well established, different staining methods for the discrimination of dispersed pig and guinea pig gastric cells have been developed on the basis of modified previous protocols for enzymatic cell dispersion. Chief and parietal cells were visualized by combined periodic acid-Schiff stains. Surface mucous and mucous n… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cells from PC ϩ and PC Ϫ preparations were smeared onto glass slides, fixed in 70% ethanol, rehydrated in PBS, and stained using a modified Maxwell technique (10) to score the fractional representation of parietal, zymogenic, and mucus-producing cells.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cells from PC ϩ and PC Ϫ preparations were smeared onto glass slides, fixed in 70% ethanol, rehydrated in PBS, and stained using a modified Maxwell technique (10) to score the fractional representation of parietal, zymogenic, and mucus-producing cells.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different cell types were identified by PAS/Alcian blue staining [9], The mucous cell fraction had a 90-95% purity, with parietal cells as the main contami nants. The ratio between neutral mucous cells and mucous neck cells was 60:40.…”
Section: Mucous Cell Isolation and Enrichmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Isolated gastric mucous cells from porcine stom achs were prepared by counterflow elutriation accord ing to an updated version of the method of Beinbom et al [9], In brief, fresh pig stomachs were provided by the local slaughterhouse. Fundic mucosa was carefully separated from muscle and connective tissue, rinsed and transported to the laboratory in buffer I .…”
Section: Mucous Cell Isolation and Enrichmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fraction F3, which consisted mainly of chief cells (74.4 ± 2.9%. n = 9) and w'as practically devoid of parietal cells as described previously [22], was used for the further experiments. Chief cells were detected by staining with brillant cresyl blue [22], Dead cells were detected by the trypan blue exclusion test [22] and amounted to 4.0 ± 0.7% (n = 9).…”
Section: Cell Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cells were prepared by a modified method of Beinborn et al [22], The following buffers were used: buffer A consisted of (mmol/1): NaCl 104: NaHCO} 4.5: KCI 5; NaH: P 0 4().5: N a;H P 0 4 I; N-(2-hydroxycthyl)piperazine-N'-2-ethanesu!fonic acid (HEPES)25; glu cose 11.1: indometacin 0.01: penicillin G 100 U/ml, and streptomy cin 100 pg/ml. Buffer B had the same composition but contained additionally (mmol/1): CaCI; 1; MgCI; 1.5, and bovine serum albu min 2 mg/ml.…”
Section: Cell Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%