2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2004.04.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Isolation of long-lived mutants in Caenorhabditis elegans using selection for resistance to juglone

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
81
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 118 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
81
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The percentage of candidate genes that directly affected lifespan at 25 °C (43.9%) was substantially higher than RNAi screens in C. elegans without a preselection criteria (<2%) (Lee et al ., 2003b; Hamilton et al ., 2005; Hansen et al ., 2005; Samuelson et al ., 2007) and within the range for screens that preselected candidates based on secondary C. elegans phenotypes, including developmental arrest (2–42%) (Chen et al ., 2007; Curran & Ruvkun, 2007), reproductive senescence (16%) (Wang et al ., 2014), thermal stress resistance (78%) (Munoz & Riddle, 2003), oxidative stress resistance (13–67%) (de Castro et al ., 2004; Kim & Sun, 2007), and activation of the mitochondrial unfolded‐protein response (53%) (Bennett et al ., 2014) (reviewed by Yanos et al ., 2012 and Sutphin & Korstanje, 2016). Tacutu et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The percentage of candidate genes that directly affected lifespan at 25 °C (43.9%) was substantially higher than RNAi screens in C. elegans without a preselection criteria (<2%) (Lee et al ., 2003b; Hamilton et al ., 2005; Hansen et al ., 2005; Samuelson et al ., 2007) and within the range for screens that preselected candidates based on secondary C. elegans phenotypes, including developmental arrest (2–42%) (Chen et al ., 2007; Curran & Ruvkun, 2007), reproductive senescence (16%) (Wang et al ., 2014), thermal stress resistance (78%) (Munoz & Riddle, 2003), oxidative stress resistance (13–67%) (de Castro et al ., 2004; Kim & Sun, 2007), and activation of the mitochondrial unfolded‐protein response (53%) (Bennett et al ., 2014) (reviewed by Yanos et al ., 2012 and Sutphin & Korstanje, 2016). Tacutu et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our data provide further points of contrast between dwarf mice, and mice whose longevity reflects either a low-calorie or a methionine-restricted diet: the former show stress resistance in tests of skin cell fibroblasts, and the latter show resistance to APAP toxicity, but not vice versa. Work in worms and flies has suggested that resistance to multiple forms of stress is characteristic of mutants that confer extended life span (Larsen, 1993;Sorensen and Loeschcke, 2001;Arking, 2001;de Castro et al, 2004), leading to the plausible idea that stress resistance itself brings about the retardation of aging and postponement of death, at least in these invertebrate systems. We take, as our working hypothesis, the idea that stress resistance in one or more cell types may play a role in the anti-aging effects of dwarf, CR and Meth-R mice, but acknowledge that much more is still to be learned about the cells and tissues involved in each of these models, the ways in which stress resistance is induced by nutritional and hormonal deviations, and the pathways by which altered cellular properties delay or decelerate age-related injuries in critical tissues.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, in nematodes (Caenorhabitis elegans) and fruit flies (Drosophila melanogaster) long-lived mutant strains are often significantly more resistant to multiple forms of stress (Larsen, 1993;Lithgow et al, 1995;Lin et al, 1998;Cheng et al, 2003;de Castro et al, 2004). Recent studies have shown similar phenomena in long-lived mice.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In life-span studies in a variety of organisms, it is frequently found that increased or decreased life span is associated with changes in the biology of reactive oxygen species (ROS) (Beckman and Ames 1998;Golden et al 2002;Droge 2003;Hekimi and Guarente 2003;Balaban et al 2005), and this is also true for a variety of C. elegans mutants (Vanfleteren and Braeckman 1999;Feng et al 2001;Senoo-Matsuda et al 2001;Hekimi and Guarente 2003;Shibata et al 2003;de Castro et al 2004;Kayser et al 2004;Sedensky and Morgan 2006) and wild-type animals treated by RNA interference (RNAi) (Dillin et al 2002;Lee et al 2003). However, although these studies, as well as many other studies that have investigated the biochemical and molecular changes that accompany altered patterns of aging, provide strong arguments for the importance of ROS in life-span determination, it remains difficult to prove or disprove the hypothesis that ROS cause aging by damaging macromolecules.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%