1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0160-4120(98)00113-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Isolation of natural organic matter ? The influence on the assimilable organic carbon

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…specific ultraviolet absorbance (SUVA) and molecular weight distribution] and reactivity (e.g. DBP formation potentials; Hem and Efraimsen 1999;Kitis et al 2001;Kilduff et al 2004). However, RO isolation unavoidably results also in concentration of inorganic ions, which may cause membrane fouling and undesired alteration of DOM characteristics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…specific ultraviolet absorbance (SUVA) and molecular weight distribution] and reactivity (e.g. DBP formation potentials; Hem and Efraimsen 1999;Kitis et al 2001;Kilduff et al 2004). However, RO isolation unavoidably results also in concentration of inorganic ions, which may cause membrane fouling and undesired alteration of DOM characteristics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies found that the biofilm formation potential was also related to the chemical and microbiological characteristics of water [6][7][8][9]. Especially for the organic content of water, the organic-carbon availabilities would lead to different biofilm formation [10][11][12]. In addition, dissolved organic matters were difficult to remove effectively in conventional water treatment processes, and the residual content could become the increasing contamination load for tap water [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite extensive use of this technique in NOM research, the DBP reactivity of lyophilized NOM has not been evaluated. Recovery data have been reported; Kunte and Pfeifer (1985) reported 87% recovery of DOC, and Hem and Efraimsen (1999) reported 10% loss of assimilable organic carbon after RO concentration, lyophilization, and reconstitution. Recently, McCurry et al (2012) reported an improved lyophilization method for NOM that recovered 101% of the TOC and 91% of the UV 254 absorbance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%