1988
DOI: 10.1016/0003-2697(88)90418-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Isolation of soybean trypsin inhibitors by affinity chromatography on anhydrotrypsin-Sepharose 4B

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The behaviour of the nonhomologous soybean Kunitz and Bowman-Birk inhibitors on anhydrotrypsin affinity chromatography has been shown to reflect their association constants with enzymes [29]. The correlation between C-terminal processing of pea TI and increased affinity for target enzymes is important in the context of their antinutritional role as well as for the exploitation of TI for the protection of crops.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The behaviour of the nonhomologous soybean Kunitz and Bowman-Birk inhibitors on anhydrotrypsin affinity chromatography has been shown to reflect their association constants with enzymes [29]. The correlation between C-terminal processing of pea TI and increased affinity for target enzymes is important in the context of their antinutritional role as well as for the exploitation of TI for the protection of crops.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to purify a trypsin inhibitor we used an affinity chromatography with trypsin attached to cyanogen bromideactivated -Sepharose 4B column as described by Pusztai et al [16] generating one retained peak ( Figure 1A). This peak was applied onto a reversed-phase HPLC (Vydac C-18TP) and three peaks were eluted with a liner acetonitrile gradient ( Figure 1B).…”
Section: Trypsin Inhibitor Purification and Molecular Mass Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For binding a specific peptide we tested various binding and elution mobile phases and compared our results with those obtained with conditions already published. Acetate buffer (50 mM) at pH 5.0 containing 20 mM CaCl 2 [17,19,20,22] and 25 mM Tris buffer at pH 7.5 containing 0.125 M NaCl [25], respectively were used for affinity binding. From our results, it emerged that the type of buffer, ionic additives, and pH level are significant parameters for binding efficiency.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Acetate buffer (0.1 M, pH 5.0) with 20 mM CaCl 2 was found to be optimal. The elution of specific peptides could be achieved by decreasing the pH with 5 mM hydrochloric acid [16,19,22], 0.1 M formic acid [20], or 50 mM glycine buffer at pH 2.2 [25]. In terms of compatibility with MALDI-TOF-MS analysis, 0.1 M formic acid was successfully applied.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation