2013
DOI: 10.3758/s13415-013-0204-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Isolation rearing effects on probabilistic learning and cognitive flexibility in rats

Abstract: Isolation rearing is a neurodevelopmental manipulation that produces neurochemical, structural, and behavioral alterations in rodents that have consistencies with schizophrenia. Symptoms induced by isolation rearing that mirror clinically relevant aspects of schizophrenia, such as cognitive deficits, open up the possibility of testing putative therapeutics in isolation-reared animals prior to clinical development. We investigated what effect isolation rearing would have on cognitive flexibility, a cognitive fu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
55
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 90 publications
(142 reference statements)
1
55
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Changes to punishment-associative learning can be quantified similarly using the lose-shift ratio. [56][57][58][59] Thus, utilizing feedback-based decision-making tasks could illuminate reward processing capabilities in patients that may underlie negative symptoms in patients. These paradigmatic challenges to learning can readily be tested in animals.…”
Section: Integrating Reward Feedback For Decision Makingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Changes to punishment-associative learning can be quantified similarly using the lose-shift ratio. [56][57][58][59] Thus, utilizing feedback-based decision-making tasks could illuminate reward processing capabilities in patients that may underlie negative symptoms in patients. These paradigmatic challenges to learning can readily be tested in animals.…”
Section: Integrating Reward Feedback For Decision Makingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This task was based on a similar task developed by Bari et al (2010) and previously described (Amitai et al, 2013). Briefly, the task presented two stimuli (holes 2 and 4) wherein responses by mice in one aperture (target) were reward 80% and punished 20% of the time, whereas the contingencies were reversed for responses in the other aperture (nontarget; Figure 1d).…”
Section: Drugsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Magazine entries were monitored using an infrared beam mounted horizontally 5 mm from the floor and recessed 6 mm into the magazine. The control of stimuli and recording of responses were managed by a SmartCtrl Package 8-In/16-Out with additional interfacing by MED-PC for Windows (Med Associates) using custom programming (Amitai et al, 2013;Young et al, 2012Young et al, , 2013c.…”
Section: Drugsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A role for serotonin was further supported by a subsequent study in mice (Ineichen et al 2012). More recently, impairments in performance in animals exposed to isolation rearing have also been reported (Amitai et al 2013). …”
Section: Reward Processing Tests In Rodent Depression Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%