Biotechnological Progress and Beverage Consumption 2020
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-816678-9.00015-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Isolation, Selection, and Identification Techniques for Non-Saccharomyces Yeasts of Oenological Interest

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 131 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The highest production of ethanol was reached by the Sc yeast with 12.70 ± 0.19% v/v at high temperature and without sulphites (Figure 1). The average ethanol production reached on day 12 by the Lt L3.1 strain (in the four trials) was 8.95 ± 0.64% v/v, in agreement with previously published values for this species [24][25][26]. It was statistically observed that the yeast with the lowest fermentation power was the F108 strain fermenting in the presence of low SO 2 and at low temperature (7.74 ± 0.04% v/v), and the one that showed the highest fermentation power was the CONCERTO yeast (10.69 ± 1.32% v/v) with low SO 2 and at high temperature.…”
Section: Fermentation Performancesupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The highest production of ethanol was reached by the Sc yeast with 12.70 ± 0.19% v/v at high temperature and without sulphites (Figure 1). The average ethanol production reached on day 12 by the Lt L3.1 strain (in the four trials) was 8.95 ± 0.64% v/v, in agreement with previously published values for this species [24][25][26]. It was statistically observed that the yeast with the lowest fermentation power was the F108 strain fermenting in the presence of low SO 2 and at low temperature (7.74 ± 0.04% v/v), and the one that showed the highest fermentation power was the CONCERTO yeast (10.69 ± 1.32% v/v) with low SO 2 and at high temperature.…”
Section: Fermentation Performancesupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Fermentation conducted with both native strains resulted in the increase of ester formation compared to the control fermented with S. cerevisiae. This fact can be explained by the developed enzymatic system related to the production of esters in both M. pulcherrima and C. famata strains [15,18,20,21,49]. Sequential fermentation for both C. famata WB-1 and M. pulcherrima B-5 induced a decrease in the total ester concentration regardless of the application of the maceration process.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The selection criteria are the quantitative and/or qualitative characteristics that reveal the activity or product of interest in a microbial community and serve as the basis for selecting a microorganism of biotechnological interest [40]. The selection criteria vary and depend on the biotechnological activity being sought.…”
Section: Selection Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%