1979
DOI: 10.1051/jphyscol:1979205
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ISOMER SHIFT CALIBRATION OF57Fe BY LIFE-TIME VARIATIONS IN THE ELECTRON-CAPTURE DECAY OF52Fe.

Abstract: Des mesures de variation de probabilité de capture électronique du 52 Fe dans différents composés de fer permettent d'estimer les densités électroniques au noyau. On en déduit une constante de calibration a pour le déplacement isomérique du 57 Fe : a =-0,31 ± 0,04 a^ .mm.s-1. Abstract.-Electron densities at the nucleus are estimated from measurements of the change in electron capture rate of 52 Fe in different iron compounds. This leads to a calibration constant a for the 57 Fe isomer shift : a =-0.31 ± 0.04 a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
9
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
4
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Further computational savings are possible since spin-orbit coupling can also safely be neglected. Linear correlation plots using effective densities versus experimental isomer shift yield a slope of a = À0.294 a 0 3 mm s À1 (PBE functional) which is in close agreement with experimentally derived 27 isomer shift calibration constant a = À0.31 a 0 3 mm s À1 . Using this correlation constant isomer shifts of very similar quality can be obtained both with and without fitting.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Further computational savings are possible since spin-orbit coupling can also safely be neglected. Linear correlation plots using effective densities versus experimental isomer shift yield a slope of a = À0.294 a 0 3 mm s À1 (PBE functional) which is in close agreement with experimentally derived 27 isomer shift calibration constant a = À0.31 a 0 3 mm s À1 . Using this correlation constant isomer shifts of very similar quality can be obtained both with and without fitting.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…This value may be compared to the consensus value a = À0.267 AE 0.115 a 0 3 mm s À1 proposed by Oldfield and co-workers 20 based on computational calibration studies, as well as the more recent value a = À0.291 a 0 3 mm s À1 obtained by Wdowik and Ruebenbauer in a series of relativistic solid-state DFT + U calculations using the PBE functional. 26 The a value recommended by Kurian and Filatov was obtained by Ladrie `re et al 27 by combining experimental 57 Fe isomer shifts with differential measurements of the electron capture rate l EC = (ln 2)t EC À1 of 52 Fe in different iron compounds, both being proportional to the contact density. The final value was then obtained by in addition using the measured 28 half-life t EC of 52 Fe as well as the contact density r 0 = 15 070 a 0…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The fit values of α are within error of the experimental value of 0.31 ± 0.04 a 0 3 mm s –1 , which has been estimated from the change in electron capture rate of 52 Fe in different iron compounds. 20 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides theoretical calculations, the contact densities can be evaluated from the experimentally measured life times of electron capture by atomic nuclei. Thus, a value of À0.31 AE 0.04 a 3 0 mm s À1 was derived by Ladrie`re et al 15 from the life-time measurements of electron capture by the 52 Fe nucleus. Because the electron capture rate is proportional to the contact density r, the a( 57 Fe) calibration constant could be obtained from a comparison of the measured life times with the 57 Fe isomer shifts in the same compounds.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%