Isomer yield ratios and cross sections for110(4.9 h)In/110(69 min)In and108(58 min) In/108(39.6 min)In produced by alpha reactions on silver

Wasilevsky, C.; Vedoya, M. De La Vega; Nassiff, S. J.

doi:10.1007/bf02166241

Cited by 7 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 14 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…[291] The nine experimental datasets available in the literature are shown in Fig. 133 [178,278,[293][294][295][296][297][298][299] together with the TENDL calculations. Six datasets were rejected (Wasilevsky et al [295] (discrepant values), Misaelides and Münzel [294] (energy steps too large, can not be controlled), Chaubey et al [296] (values too high), Fukushima et al [293] (values Fig.…”

Section: Cd(d2n) 110m Inmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…133 [178,278,[293][294][295][296][297][298][299] together with the TENDL calculations. Six datasets were rejected (Wasilevsky et al [295] (discrepant values), Misaelides and Münzel [294] (energy steps too large, can not be controlled), Chaubey et al [296] (values too high), Fukushima et al [293] (values Fig. 133 Nine experimental datasets for the 107 Ag(α,n) 110m In reaction available in the literature [178,278,[293][294][295][296][297][298][299], and TENDL calculations Fig.…”

Section: Cd(d2n) 110m Inmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Six datasets were rejected (Wasilevsky et al [295] (discrepant values), Misaelides and Münzel [294] (energy steps too large, can not be controlled), Chaubey et al [296] (values too high), Fukushima et al [293] (values Fig. 133 Nine experimental datasets for the 107 Ag(α,n) 110m In reaction available in the literature [178,278,[293][294][295][296][297][298][299], and TENDL calculations Fig. 134 Three selected experimental datasets for the 107 Ag(α,n) 110m In reaction [178,278,299] with the Padé fit (L = 9, N = 32, χ 2 = 1.94, solid line) and estimated total uncertainties in percentages, including 4% systematic uncertainty (dashed line, right-hand scale) too low at higher energy), Patel et al [297] (values too low), Takács et al [298] (values too low)), and the remaining three sets were used in the statistical fitting procedure.…”

Section: Cd(d2n) 110m Inmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Recommended nuclear data for medical radioisotope production: diagnostic positron emitters

Tárkányi

Ignatyuk

Hermanne

et al. 2019

J Radioanal Nucl Chem

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

An IAEA coordinated research project that began in 2012 and ended in 2016 was primarily dedicated to the compilation, evaluation and recommendation of cross-section data for the production of medical radionuclides. One significant part of this work focused on diagnostic positron emitters. These particular studies consist of 69 reactions for direct and indirect or generator production of 44 Sc(44 Ti), 52m Mn(52 Fe), 52g Mn, 55 Co, 61 Cu, 62 Cu(62 Zn), 66 Ga, 68 Ga(68 Ge), 72 As(72 Se), 73 Se, 76 Br, 82 Rb(82 Sr), 82m Rb, 86 Y, 89 Zr, 90 Nb, 94m Tc, 110m In(110 Sn), 118 Sb(118 Te), 120 I, 122 I(122 Xe), 128 Cs(128 Ba), and 140 Pr(140 Nd) medical radionuclides. The resulting reference cross-section data were obtained from Padé fits to selected and corrected experimental data, and integral thick target yields were subsequently deduced. Uncertainties in the fitted results were estimated via a Padé least-squares method with the addition of a 4% assessed systematic uncertainty. Experimental data were also compared with theoretical predictions available from the TENDL-2015 and TENDL-2017 libraries. All of the numerical reference cross-section data with their corresponding uncertainties and deduced integral thick target yields are available on-line at the IAEA-NDS medical portal www-nds.iaea.org/medic alpor tal and also at the IAEA-NDS web page www-nds.iaea.org/ medic al/posit ron_emitt ers.html.

show abstract