1971
DOI: 10.1080/10671188.1971.10615067
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Isometric Strength and Relative Isometric Endurance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is also surprising as it may be thought that climbers would be able to continue to maintain grip for a greater length of time than nonclimbers. Previous investigations have demonstrated a negative relationship between MVC and relative endurance such that stronger individuals have the lowest isometric endurance and those with lesser maximum strength possess superior relative endurance (Carlson 1969;Carlson and McCraw 1971). Therefore, as climbers seem to be no stronger than sedentary subjects, there are no potential detrimental eects on the ability to maintain sustained contractions, which would be the consequence of a greater strength.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…This is also surprising as it may be thought that climbers would be able to continue to maintain grip for a greater length of time than nonclimbers. Previous investigations have demonstrated a negative relationship between MVC and relative endurance such that stronger individuals have the lowest isometric endurance and those with lesser maximum strength possess superior relative endurance (Carlson 1969;Carlson and McCraw 1971). Therefore, as climbers seem to be no stronger than sedentary subjects, there are no potential detrimental eects on the ability to maintain sustained contractions, which would be the consequence of a greater strength.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Previous studies which have assessed endurance times in non-climbers found a shorter isometric endurance with those who had a greater MVC (Carlson, 1969;Carlson & McCraw, 1971;Ferguson & Brown, 1997). In the current study the absence of this negative relationship between MVC and endurance is more likely caused by the elite group being able to contract for a longer period of time, as opposed to the lower level groups contracting for a shorter period of time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the second visit, maximum voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) was determined and one continuous, fatiguing muscle action was performed to determine the T lim at a randomly ordered percentage of MVIC (30, 45, 60, or 75%). These %MVIC values were selected to be consistent with those used in previous studies that examined endurance times during isometric muscle actions (Carlson and McCraw, 1971;Heyward, 1975). The subsequent three visits were to determine the T lim values for the remaining randomly ordered percentages of MVIC.…”
Section: Subjectsmentioning
confidence: 96%