1991
DOI: 10.1007/bf01066696
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Isomorphism of the Baumslag-Solitar groups

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The groups BS(m, n) have been classified by Moldavanski [27]. They are in bijection with the set of unordered pairs (m, n) with 0 < m |n|.…”
Section: Baumslag-solitar Groupsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The groups BS(m, n) have been classified by Moldavanski [27]. They are in bijection with the set of unordered pairs (m, n) with 0 < m |n|.…”
Section: Baumslag-solitar Groupsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using , it is easy to show that the isomorphism type of BS.m; n/ determines m and n (normalized by 1 Ä m Ä jnj) see Moldavanskiȋ [27]. In most cases, m and n are determined by m=n (given by ) and jm nj (given by abelianizing).…”
Section: Remarksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So in that case, BS(n, m) is nonamenable. In [Mo91] it was proven that BS(n 1 , m 1 ) ∼ = BS(n 2 , m 2 ) if and only if {n 1 , m 1 } = {εn 2 , εm 2 } for some ε ∈ {−1, 1}. So all nonamenable Baumslag-Solitar groups are up to isomorphism of the form BS(n, m) for some 2 ≤ n ≤ |m|.…”
Section: Baumslag-solitar Groups and Hnn Extensionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These groups were introduced by Baumslag and Solitar in [BS62] to provide the first examples of two generator non-Hopfian groups with a single defining relation. In [Mo91], it was shown that BS(n 1 , m 1 ) ∼ = BS(n 2 , m 2 ) if and only if {n 1 , m 1 } = {εn 2 , εm 2 } for some ε ∈ {−1, 1}. Hence we may always assume that 1 ≤ n ≤ |m|.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%