We say that a theory T is intermediate under effective reducibility if the isomorphism problems among its computable models is neither hyperarithmetic nor on top under effective reducibility. We prove that if an infinitary sentence T is uniformly effectively dense, a property we define in the paper, then no extension of it is intermediate, at least when relativized to every oracle in a cone. As an application we show that no infinitary sentence whose models are all linear orderings is intermediate under effective reducibility relative to every oracle in a cone. §1. Introduction. We show a connection between Vaught's conjecture and an intriguing open question about computable structures. The question we are referring to asks whether every nice theory T (given by a computably infinitary sentence) satisfies what we call the no-intermediate-extension property, which essentially means that for every nice extensionT of T (i.e.,T = T ∧ ϕ, where ϕ is a computable infinitary sentence), the isomorphism problem among the computable models ofT is either "simple," or as complicated as possible, but is never intermediate. (Throughout this paper, "theory" means "L 1 , -sentence".) By "simple" here we mean hyperarithmetic, and by "as complicated as possible" we mean universal among all Σ 1 1 -equivalences relations on under effective reducibility. See Definition 1.3. It is already known that if T has this property when relativized to all oracles, then Vaught's conjecture holds among the extensions of T (Becker [3]). The main result of this paper is a partial reversal, showing that the no-intermediate-extension property follows from a strengthening of Vaught's conjecture, which we call the uniform-effective-density property.As a bit of evidence that this strengthening is not too strong, we show that the theory of linear orderings has the uniform-effective-density property. It thus follows that the isomorphism problem among the computable models of any given theoryT extending that of linear orderings, is either hyperarithmetic or as complicated as possible, but never intermediate, at least relative to every oracle in a cone (Theorem 1.4).