2019
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1912.05226
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Isomorphism types of Rogers semilattices in the analytical hierarchy

Abstract: A numbering of a countable family S is a surjective map from the set of natural numbers ω onto S. A numbering ν is reducible to a numbering µ if there is an effective procedure which given a ν-index of an object from S, computes a µ-index for the same object. The reducibility between numberings gives rise to a class of upper semilattices, which are usually called Rogers semilattices. The paper studies Rogers semilattices for families S ⊂ P (ω) belonging to various levels of the analytical hierarchy. We prove t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 30 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Goncharov and Sorbi (1997) started developing the theory of generalized computable numberings. Their approach initiated a fruitful line of research, which is focused on numberings for families of sets which belong to various levels of recursion-theoretic hierarchies: the arithmetical hierarchy (Badaev et al 2006;Bazhenov et al 2019c;Podzorov 2008), the Ershov hierarchy (Badaev and Lempp 2009;Goncharov et al 2002;Herbert et al 2019;Ospichev 2015), the analytical hierarchy (Bazhenov et al 2019d(Bazhenov et al , 2020bDorzhieva 2019), etc. We refer the reader to Goncharov (2008, 2000) for further background on numberings in these hierarchies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Goncharov and Sorbi (1997) started developing the theory of generalized computable numberings. Their approach initiated a fruitful line of research, which is focused on numberings for families of sets which belong to various levels of recursion-theoretic hierarchies: the arithmetical hierarchy (Badaev et al 2006;Bazhenov et al 2019c;Podzorov 2008), the Ershov hierarchy (Badaev and Lempp 2009;Goncharov et al 2002;Herbert et al 2019;Ospichev 2015), the analytical hierarchy (Bazhenov et al 2019d(Bazhenov et al , 2020bDorzhieva 2019), etc. We refer the reader to Goncharov (2008, 2000) for further background on numberings in these hierarchies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%