1966
DOI: 10.1107/s0365110x66002718
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Isomorphous substitution and formulas for phase determination

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
201
0
14

Year Published

1969
1969
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 199 publications
(218 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
201
0
14
Order By: Relevance
“…Fan proposed in 1965 32 the use of direct methods in breaking the phase ambiguity intrinsic to single anomalous diffraction (SAD) and single isomorphous replacement (SIR) methods. Similar investigations were reported by different authors during 1960s and 1970s 33–38. From the early 1980s to the early 2000s, the combination of direct methods with SAD/SIR data was emphasized in direct‐method research worldwide 39–63.…”
Section: Direct Methods In Macromolecular Crystallographysupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Fan proposed in 1965 32 the use of direct methods in breaking the phase ambiguity intrinsic to single anomalous diffraction (SAD) and single isomorphous replacement (SIR) methods. Similar investigations were reported by different authors during 1960s and 1970s 33–38. From the early 1980s to the early 2000s, the combination of direct methods with SAD/SIR data was emphasized in direct‐method research worldwide 39–63.…”
Section: Direct Methods In Macromolecular Crystallographysupporting
confidence: 78%
“…When dealing with structures having centrosymmetric heavy-atom arrangements, (17) reduces to either of the two probability formulae given by Karle (1966) according to whether SIR or OAS data are used. On the other hand, while the Karle formulae are not applicable to structures having non-centrosymmetric heavy-atom arrangements, (16) or (17) is very efficient for resolving phase ambiguities in this case.…”
Section: Llmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method does not make full use of the information which could be obtained from a single isomorphous pair. Fan (1965a) and Karle (1966) suggested the use of 'component relationships', i.e. the relationships among the real and imaginary components of the structure factors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If a method can be found to resolve the ambiguity, the OAS method would be a useful technique in protein crystallography, since it is possible to solve a protein structure by either skipping the step of heavy-atomderivative preparation if it contains suitable anomalous scatterers, or using only a heavy-atom derivative which may not be isomorphous to the native protein. Attempts have been made to resolve the phase ambiguity arising from the OAS technique by direct methods since the 1960's (Fan, 1965;Karle, 1966). More recently, Hauptman (1982), Giacovazzo (1983) and Karle (1984) have succeeded in deriving a large number of three-phase structure invariants * Supported in part by the National Natural Science Foundation of China.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%