1975
DOI: 10.1627/jpi1959.17.88
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Isopentane Dehydrogenation with Chromia-Alumina Catalyst

Abstract: Summary:Dehydrogenation of isopentane over chromia-alumina catalyst of several sizes coke was observed in a fixed-bed reactor. The coke distribution in a catalyst pellet was found to be uniform. The diffusivity of the reactants within the catalyst pellet was measured and found to be a linear function of the coke content. A kinetic model was proposed and kinetic parameters were estimated by computer simulation under the condition that intraparticle diffusion was negligible. Using this kinetic model and the func… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1986
1986
1986
1986

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…9, the rate is inversely proportional to the square of pellet diameter, which confirms pore diffusion control . From these results, the burning rate of coke, that is, the rate of regeneration, is represented by (4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11) concentration of carbon in a particle, and Co2 is oxygen concentration in the gaseous phase. Since the dehydrogenation of n-butane, deactivation rate of catalyst, and regeneration rate were clarified, let us here consider the optimum operating conditions for this dehydrogenation process.…”
Section: Reaction Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9, the rate is inversely proportional to the square of pellet diameter, which confirms pore diffusion control . From these results, the burning rate of coke, that is, the rate of regeneration, is represented by (4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11) concentration of carbon in a particle, and Co2 is oxygen concentration in the gaseous phase. Since the dehydrogenation of n-butane, deactivation rate of catalyst, and regeneration rate were clarified, let us here consider the optimum operating conditions for this dehydrogenation process.…”
Section: Reaction Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 99%