2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jct.2017.05.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Isopiestic determination of the osmotic and activity coefficients of the { y Mg(NO 3 ) 2 + (1 − y )MgSO 4 }(aq) system at T = 298.15 K

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As seen in Figure 2, the osmotic coefficients for the {yNaH 2 PO 4 + (1 − y)Na 2 HPO 4 }(aq) system, derived from the study of Scharge et al, 13 are systematically lower than those obtained in the present investigation. A similar situation occurs for the chemically similar {yKH 2 PO 4 + (1 − y)K 2 HPO 4 }(aq) system as described by Ivanovićet al 11 Scharge et al 12 dried their source chemicals at T = 378 K and prepared their solutions by mass using the presumed anhydrous material. In contrast, in our studies, the molalities of the stock solutions were standardized by determination of the phosphate contents of the solutions by gravimetric analyses.…”
Section: Consideration Of the Differences Between Our Isopiestic Resu...mentioning
confidence: 71%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…As seen in Figure 2, the osmotic coefficients for the {yNaH 2 PO 4 + (1 − y)Na 2 HPO 4 }(aq) system, derived from the study of Scharge et al, 13 are systematically lower than those obtained in the present investigation. A similar situation occurs for the chemically similar {yKH 2 PO 4 + (1 − y)K 2 HPO 4 }(aq) system as described by Ivanovićet al 11 Scharge et al 12 dried their source chemicals at T = 378 K and prepared their solutions by mass using the presumed anhydrous material. In contrast, in our studies, the molalities of the stock solutions were standardized by determination of the phosphate contents of the solutions by gravimetric analyses.…”
Section: Consideration Of the Differences Between Our Isopiestic Resu...mentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Table 6 reports the mixing parameters for a variety of constraints: both with and without the higher-order electrostatic mixing terms being included and with and without being constrained by θ ij values fixed at those obtained from the chemically similar {yK 2 HPO 4 + (1 − y)KH 2 PO 4 }(aq) system. 11 Examination of the standard uncertainties for the variants of the model with either one or two mixing parameters indicates that the model with higher-order electrostatic mixing terms and the single adjustable mixing parameter s θ H 2 PO 4 ,HPO 4 is as accurate or more accurate than models with two mixing parameters and is our selected model. In Figure 9 are shown differences between experimental and calculated osmotic coefficients for the system {yNaH 2 PO 4 + (1 − y)Na 2 HPO 4 }(aq) at T = 298.15 K calculated using the extended Pitzer model with the parameter s θ H 2 PO 4 ,HPO 4 = −0.0017 kg•mol −1 with higher-order electrostatic terms, with standard uncertainty of the fit being u(ϕ) = 5.3 × 10 −4 .…”
Section: Journal Of Chemicalmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations