1992
DOI: 10.1016/0375-9474(92)90041-h
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Isospin-nonconserving particle decays in light nuclei

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

5
32
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
5
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As many of the known partial and total decay widths have been measured in 20 Ne(p, p) scattering experiments after the work of [5], see [19,20], as well as a more recent measurement of γp coincidences, the present interpretation has a more solid foundation.…”
Section: Interpretation Of Decay Schemementioning
confidence: 67%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…As many of the known partial and total decay widths have been measured in 20 Ne(p, p) scattering experiments after the work of [5], see [19,20], as well as a more recent measurement of γp coincidences, the present interpretation has a more solid foundation.…”
Section: Interpretation Of Decay Schemementioning
confidence: 67%
“…To further suppress the Na contamination we made use of the fact that the proton beam on the ISOLDE target is pulsed with pulse spacing a multiple of 1.2 s. This, together with the fact that 21 Mg and 21 Na have a large difference in half-lives, 122(2) ms and 22.49(4) s respectively [4], and that the timescale for Mg ions to diffuse out of the target, be ionized, and transported to the setup is of the order of 100 ms, provides a natural way of suppressing the isobaric contamination of Na by only letting the beam into the setup during the first 300 ms following proton impact on target. From measurements on mass 20, which show a similar difference in the half-lives of 20 Mg and 20 Na, a ratio of 20 …”
Section: Beam Productionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 3 more Smart Citations