2007
DOI: 10.1021/ic070253u
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Isostructural neo-Pentoxide Derivatives of Group 3 and the Lanthanide Series Metals for the Production of Ln2O3 Nanoparticles

Abstract: The synthesis and characterization of a series of neo-pentoxide (OCH2C(CH3)3 or ONep) derivatives of group 3 and the lanthanide (Ln) series' metals were undertaken via an amide/alcohol exchange route. Surprisingly, the products isolated and characterized by single-crystal X-ray diffraction yielded isostructural species for every trivalent cation studied: [Ln(mu-ONep)2(ONep)]4 [Ln=Sc (1), Y (2), La (3), Ce (4), Pr (5), Nd (6), Sm (7), Eu (8), Gd (9), Tb (10), Dy (11), Ho (12), Er (13), Tm (14), Yb (15), Lu (16)… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
32
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
5
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using the more sterically demanding Onep ligand reduced the nuclearity and prevented the formation of an oxo ligand as noted for the smaller OiPr derivative Er 5 (µ 5 -O)(µ 3 -OiPr) 4 (µ-OiPr) 4 (OiPr) 5 . [10,11] The resultant species, identified as [Er(µ-Onep) 2 (Onep)] 4 (1), is consistent with the other Ln-and Group 3 neopentoxide species (Figure 1) [31] wherein, each of the four trigonal bipyramidal (TBP) Er metal centers possess two µ-Onep and one Onep ligand. Attempts to isolate this compound using the Lewis basic solvents thf (2) did not lead to X-ray quality crystals; however, from py the tetramer observed in 1 was reduced to a trinuclear species surprisingly forming an oxo species, [Er(µ 3 -O)(µ-Onep) 6 (Onep) 4 (py) 3 ] (3).…”
Section: Crystal Structuressupporting
confidence: 67%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Using the more sterically demanding Onep ligand reduced the nuclearity and prevented the formation of an oxo ligand as noted for the smaller OiPr derivative Er 5 (µ 5 -O)(µ 3 -OiPr) 4 (µ-OiPr) 4 (OiPr) 5 . [10,11] The resultant species, identified as [Er(µ-Onep) 2 (Onep)] 4 (1), is consistent with the other Ln-and Group 3 neopentoxide species (Figure 1) [31] wherein, each of the four trigonal bipyramidal (TBP) Er metal centers possess two µ-Onep and one Onep ligand. Attempts to isolate this compound using the Lewis basic solvents thf (2) did not lead to X-ray quality crystals; however, from py the tetramer observed in 1 was reduced to a trinuclear species surprisingly forming an oxo species, [Er(µ 3 -O)(µ-Onep) 6 (Onep) 4 (py) 3 ] (3).…”
Section: Crystal Structuressupporting
confidence: 67%
“…The source of the oxo species is not known as of yet and typically not observed for the Onep derivatives, unless esterification mechanisms from side reactions with carboxylic acids occur but may be due to adventitious water in the solvent. [30][31][32] Increasing the steric bulk to the OtBu groups, led to crystallization of the trinuclear 4 which had additional HOtBu bound to it, as shown in Figure 2. Previously, we isolated a Ce/OtBu tetramer [30] that did not possess any Lewis basic solvents (i.e., thf, py, or HOtBu) however, the Er corollary could not be isolated without bound solvents as noted for the pyridine adduct, Er 3 (µ 3 -O)(µ-OtBu) 4 -(OtBu) 3 (py) 3 (7).…”
Section: Crystal Structuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Some organic compounds that are notable in terms of gravimetric and volumetric capacities are highlighted in Figure 3. Again, it is important to check for outliers where the values might not represent true information (e.g., "C6 H132 O12 Sc4 O", where the carbon atom count should be 60, rather than 6; structural formula: [Sc(OCH2C(CH3))3]4) [25]. Inevitably, crystallised hydrocarbons like propane and butane possess high gravimetric and volumetric hydrogen capacities [26].…”
Section: Organic Compoundsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In many instances, the nuclearity of the M(OR) x precursor has been shown to play a role in determining the various properties of the final ceramic [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13]; therefore, it is of interest to garner control over the structure of these precursors. Unfortunately, due to the large cation size and small charge of the ligands, M(OR) x often suffer from clustering and oligomerization with bridging alkoxide (m-OR) ligands filling open coordination sites.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%