2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2009.09.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Isotope (14C and 13C) analysis of deep peat CO2 using a passive sampling technique

Abstract: 10 11We developed and tested a new method to collect CO 2 from the surface to deep layers of a 12 peatland for radiocarbon analysis. The method comprises two components: i) a probe equipped 13 with a hydrophobic filter that allows entry of peat gases by diffusion, whilst simultaneously 14 excluding water, and, ii) a cartridge containing zeolite molecular sieve that traps CO 2 passively. 15We field tested the method by sampling at depths of between 0.25 and 4 m at duplicate sites 16 within a temperate raised pe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
22
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
3
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This was particularly evident with the 2 deepest sets (2 and 4 m) where results for both CO 2 and CH 4 components were within measurement uncertainty (<2 ) of each other. 14 C results for these 2 depths also agreed very closely with dissolved CO 2 results reported previously from Langlands Moss using the passive sampling method (Garnett and Hardie 2009 A were 2524 ± 46 and 4019 ± 64 BP, both within 1  of the results for CO 2 collected at the same depths, only ~3 m away, using the passive sampling method (2571 ± 48 and 4006 ± 63 BP, respectively; Garnett and Hardie 2009). Therefore, the similarities in 14 C results between Sites A and B in this study (both CO 2 and CH 4 fractions), and the excellent agreement of the 14 C results for CO 2 between this study and the earlier study, provide strong support that the new sampling and processing methods have performed reliably.…”
Section: Test Of Sampling and Laboratory Methods On Field Samplessupporting
confidence: 85%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This was particularly evident with the 2 deepest sets (2 and 4 m) where results for both CO 2 and CH 4 components were within measurement uncertainty (<2 ) of each other. 14 C results for these 2 depths also agreed very closely with dissolved CO 2 results reported previously from Langlands Moss using the passive sampling method (Garnett and Hardie 2009 A were 2524 ± 46 and 4019 ± 64 BP, both within 1  of the results for CO 2 collected at the same depths, only ~3 m away, using the passive sampling method (2571 ± 48 and 4006 ± 63 BP, respectively; Garnett and Hardie 2009). Therefore, the similarities in 14 C results between Sites A and B in this study (both CO 2 and CH 4 fractions), and the excellent agreement of the 14 C results for CO 2 between this study and the earlier study, provide strong support that the new sampling and processing methods have performed reliably.…”
Section: Test Of Sampling and Laboratory Methods On Field Samplessupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The MSC used has previously been described and tested several times before for collection of CO 2 from various atmospheres (e.g. Hardie et al 2005;Garnett and Hardie 2009;Garnett and Hartley 2010). Very briefly, it consists of a quartz glass tube containing ~3-4 g of Type 13X zeolite molecular sieve (1/ 16 pellets, BDH, UK) held within a central chamber using quartz wool.…”
Section: Laboratory Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…CO 2 evading the rock accumulates in the chamber and can be sampled using a zeolite molecular sieve trap Garnett and Hardie, 2009;Hardie et al, 2005 Figure 2. An example of the monitoring of the CO 2 accumulating in a chamber.…”
Section: Co 2 Sampling and Isotopic Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%