2015
DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.5b01410
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Isotope-Coded Labeling for Accelerated Protein Interaction Profiling Using MS

Abstract: Protein interaction surface mapping using MS is widely applied but comparatively resource intensive. Here a workflow adaptation for use of isotope coded tandem mass tags for the purpose is reported. The key benefit of improved throughput derived from sample acquisition multiplexing and automated analysis is shown to be maintained in the new application. Mapping of the epitopes of two monoclonal antibodies on their respective targets serves to illustrate the novel approach. We conclude that the approach enables… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the number of TMT peptides was increased from 1 to 10 min and then dropped at 60 min (Figure S1c). The TMT labeling is a rapid reaction, as 1 min of incubation reached almost 20% of TMT peptides (Figure c), consistent with previous work where the labeling time was as short as 1 min for simple protein systems. To optimize a reasonable handling time for large-scale analysis, we further tested the labeling at a low temperature (on ice) to slow the reaction. We found the reaction rate was too slow at 0 °C compared to 21 °C and could not reach a plateau even with long time incubation (Figure S1d).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, the number of TMT peptides was increased from 1 to 10 min and then dropped at 60 min (Figure S1c). The TMT labeling is a rapid reaction, as 1 min of incubation reached almost 20% of TMT peptides (Figure c), consistent with previous work where the labeling time was as short as 1 min for simple protein systems. To optimize a reasonable handling time for large-scale analysis, we further tested the labeling at a low temperature (on ice) to slow the reaction. We found the reaction rate was too slow at 0 °C compared to 21 °C and could not reach a plateau even with long time incubation (Figure S1d).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Moreover, Lys residues are positively charged and usually accessible for chemical labeling. Indeed, applications of Lys-specific labeling reagents to protein structural analysis have been published for purified proteins in small scales. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, the amine-reactive quantification reagent, tandem mass tag (TMT), has been used for the same purpose. 53 , 54 Glycine ethyl ester (GEE) in combination with coupling reagents such as carbodiimides is used for modifying carboxyl groups. 55 The more promiscuous reagent, diethyl pyrocarbonate (DEPC) has been shown to modify several amino acid residues (His, Lys, Tyr, Ser, Thr and Cys).…”
Section: Covalent Labelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 71 Lys-specific labeling using the TMT reagent has been applied to antibody–antigen complexes involving therapeutic antibodies. 54 An elegant example of the combination of several labeling methods was reported by the Vachet group. 72 In this work, labeling of lysine residues with NHSA, of arginine residues with 2,3-butanedione and less specific labeling with DEPC have been applied to study the dimerization of β 2 -microglobulin.…”
Section: Covalent Labelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The detailed inspection of crosslinked peptides permits the pinpointing of contact sides between the different proteins. In H/D exchange experiments or by probing proteins by hydroxyl radicals or other reagents (see Section 4.1.3), conformational dynamics due to protein-protein interactions or induced by PTMs, ligand or metal ion bindings may be unravelled (Ramisetty & Washburn, 2011;Venable et al, 2015). Whereas the above approaches are shotgun MS oriented, novel MS methods allow interaction studies to be made on whole protein complexes and other associates (see Section 4.1.5).…”
Section: The Far From Complete Picture Of Interaction Partners Andmentioning
confidence: 99%