2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.03.068
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Isotopic composition of throughfall in pine plantation and native eucalyptus forest in South Australia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
42
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
3
42
3
Order By: Relevance
“…DeWalle and Swistock () found that enrichment of TF δ 18 O relative to P g was negatively correlated with rainfall intensity. Conversely, Xu et al () showed no significant relationship between enrichment of TF δ 18 O compared with P g and total rainfall depth, and Allen et al () derived generally weak and inconsistent relationships between deviation of δ 18 O in TF relative to P g and event size, I / P g or precipitation intensity. Soulsby et al () also found no statistical relationship between TF isotopic composition and P g amount or maximum intensity.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…DeWalle and Swistock () found that enrichment of TF δ 18 O relative to P g was negatively correlated with rainfall intensity. Conversely, Xu et al () showed no significant relationship between enrichment of TF δ 18 O compared with P g and total rainfall depth, and Allen et al () derived generally weak and inconsistent relationships between deviation of δ 18 O in TF relative to P g and event size, I / P g or precipitation intensity. Soulsby et al () also found no statistical relationship between TF isotopic composition and P g amount or maximum intensity.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Brodersen et al () reported general enrichment of δ 18 O in TF relative to P g for spruce and beech trees, but saw both enrichment and depletion of δ 18 O in SF relative to P g for a beech tree. Xu et al () found both enrichment and depletion of TF δ 18 O relative to that of P g for a pine plantation and a native eucalyptus forest in South Australia. Isotopic fluctuations of TF corresponded to those of P g in a Japanese cedar forest and those of SF did not, which Ikawa et al () attributed to rainwater storage in the canopy and on stems as well as the mixing of incoming and stored water with different isotopic compositions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…As observed by others (i.e., Dewalle & Swistock, 1994;Saxena, 1986;Stockinger, Lücke, Vereecken, & Bogena, 2017;Xu et al, 2014), our data also showed an enrichment pattern, with lighter throughfall than rainfall more common during the growing season (at higher temperatures) and heavier throughfall than rainfall more common during the dormant season (at lower temperatures). This pattern corroborates that fractionation is temperature dependent and that molecular bonds between lighter isotopes are more easily broken than molecular bonds between heavier isotopes (Majoube, 1971).…”
Section: Intrastorm Isotopic Composition Of Rainfall and Throughfallsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Improving our understanding about rainfall partitioning in forests ecosystems is very important for studies that focus on forest hydrology to better management and decision making on this vital ecosystems (Ajami et al, 2011;Brecciaroli et al, 2012;Davudirad et al, 2015;Dohnal et al, 2014;Frot et al, 2007;Holko et al, 2009;Xu et al, 2014). Such eco-hydrological studies lead to a proper hydrological balance analysis and therefore have been well considered in forest hydrology studies during last few decades (Adriaenssens et al, 2012;Bosch and Hewlett, 1982;Carlyle-Moses, 2004;Devlaeminck et al, 2005;Gurav et al, 2012;Marin et al, 2000;Llorens and Domingo, 2007;Mitchell et al, 1986;Molina and Campo, 2012;Nanko et al, 2006;Park and Cameron, 2008;Rahmani et al, 2011;Shachnovich et al, 2008;Tcherepanov et al, 2005;Xu et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…rainfall characteristics, canopy architecture, branch angle, canopy cover, tree age, leaves shapes, types and dimensions, phonological stages, and even silvicutural practices affect hydrologic behavior of forest stand against input rainfall (Brandt, 1987;Bruijnzeel, 2005;Davudirad et al, 2015;Davudirad et al, 2016;Gay et al, 2015;Guswa and Spence, 2012;Huber and Iroumé, 2001;Molina and Campo, 2012;Nanko et al, 2006;Onozawa et al, 2009;Pérez-Suárez et al, 2008;Pypker et al, 2005;Staelens et al, 2007;Van Stan et al, 2012;Xu et al, 2014). Due to dynamic varia-bility of affecting factors in space and time, the throughfall as an important component of hydrologic cycle in forest ecosystems varies temporally and spatially (Forti and Neal, 1992;Staelens et al, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%