1998
DOI: 10.1086/306238
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Isotopic Lithium Abundances in Nine Halo Stars

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

25
202
5

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 190 publications
(232 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
25
202
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The problem with this isotope is that detections for metal-poor stars are very challenging and very rare. Smith et al (1993) reported the first probable detection of 6 Li in HD 84937 ( 6 Li/ 7 Li = 0.05 ± 0.02) which was later confirmed by other works (Hobbs & Thorburn 1994;Smith et al 1998;Cayrel et al 1999). A few years after this first detection, a detection for another star, BD +26 • 3578 ( 6 Li/ 7 Li = 0.05 ± 0.03, Smith et al 1998), was reported.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The problem with this isotope is that detections for metal-poor stars are very challenging and very rare. Smith et al (1993) reported the first probable detection of 6 Li in HD 84937 ( 6 Li/ 7 Li = 0.05 ± 0.02) which was later confirmed by other works (Hobbs & Thorburn 1994;Smith et al 1998;Cayrel et al 1999). A few years after this first detection, a detection for another star, BD +26 • 3578 ( 6 Li/ 7 Li = 0.05 ± 0.03, Smith et al 1998), was reported.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…Smith et al (1993) reported the first probable detection of 6 Li in HD 84937 ( 6 Li/ 7 Li = 0.05 ± 0.02) which was later confirmed by other works (Hobbs & Thorburn 1994;Smith et al 1998;Cayrel et al 1999). A few years after this first detection, a detection for another star, BD +26 • 3578 ( 6 Li/ 7 Li = 0.05 ± 0.03, Smith et al 1998), was reported. Possible detections for two other stars were provided by Cayrel et al (1999) and Nissen et al (2000): BD+42 • 2667 ( 6 Li/ 7 Li = 0.10) and G 271-162 ( 6 Li/ 7 Li = 0.02 ± 0.01) respectively.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…The lithium abundance was determined using the accurate laboratory atomic data of Smith et al (1998). A solar isotopic ratio 7 Li/ 6 Li = 12.18 was adopted ).…”
Section: Methods Of Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The g f values of the Li lines are among the most accurate for any stellar lines (Smith et al 1998), and can safely be used in an absolute manner. The result is A(Li) = −10.84±0.10 and −11.19 ± 0.13 for HD 27536 and HD 216803, respectively, the errors coming primarily from uncertainty in the continuum placement and the influence from the weak Fe i, V i, and CN blends.…”
Section: Notes On Individual Abundancesmentioning
confidence: 99%