lecular markers within mapping populations (Wendel and Parks, 1984;Torres et al., 1985; Molecular tools have not identified the gene(s) governing apomixis Paterson et al., 1988Paterson et al., , 1991Saito et al., 1991; Lyt-nor have they been used to successfully transfer the trait to important, sexually reproducing food crops. Several molecular studies addressing tle, 1991;Schon et al., 1991; Zivy et al., 1992; Causse et apomixis in grasses have used interspecific and intergeneric hybrids. al., 1994; Chittenden et al., 1994). This loss of specific The failure to recover specific F 1 genotypes from these wide crosses genotypes from the progeny may be due to interactions can be caused by unfavorable interactions between the gametes, zybetween genes of the two species within gametes, zygote, embryo, endosperm, and/ or maternal tissue. These interactions gote, embryo, endosperm, or maternal tissue (Hadley can eliminate recombinant genotypes with valuable information toand Openshaw, 1980). Differential viability of offspring wards linkage analyses of the trait. Buffelgrass [Pennisetum ciliare because of allelic interactions has been reported in (L.) Link syn. Cenchrus ciliaris L.], a polymorphic species with intermaize (Zea mays L.)-Tripsacum hybrids (Maguire, fertile apomictic and sexual genotypes, offers an opportunity to genetically map apomixis by means of intraspecific hybrids with euploid 1963), tomato, Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. (Rick, genomes. This study reports a linkage map of the apospory region in 1966), wheat, Triticum aestivum L. (Manabe et al., 1999), buffelgrass. Apospory, classified by progeny testing and cytologically and rice,