2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.elerap.2018.03.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

iSpy? Tailored versus Invasive Ads and Consumers’ Perceptions of Personalized Advertising

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
49
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
1
49
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In this context, to better characterize this relation, we could rely on the overt manipulation of the stimuli (i.e., commercial offers) both to elicit diverse attitudes of disfavor and favor in the customers and, consequently, to impact consumers' decision (i.e., different willingness to pay). Indeed, the modulation of a commercial through the amount of provided information and the personalization of the message may have a significant influence on consumers' attitudes and final choice (Hahn et al, 1992 ; Coulter et al, 2001 ; Goldsmith and Freiden, 2004 ; Xu, 2006 ; Ünal et al, 2011 ; Bostrom et al, 2013 ; Boerman et al, 2017 ; Gironda and Korgaonkar, 2018 ), with a possible impact also on the FAA and on the consequent relation between these variables. Specifically, when information is limited, customers hardly undertake an in-depth commercial evaluation and an accurate final decision; conversely, when the information load increases, the capacity for information processing and the consistency of decision-making increase (Hahn et al, 1992 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this context, to better characterize this relation, we could rely on the overt manipulation of the stimuli (i.e., commercial offers) both to elicit diverse attitudes of disfavor and favor in the customers and, consequently, to impact consumers' decision (i.e., different willingness to pay). Indeed, the modulation of a commercial through the amount of provided information and the personalization of the message may have a significant influence on consumers' attitudes and final choice (Hahn et al, 1992 ; Coulter et al, 2001 ; Goldsmith and Freiden, 2004 ; Xu, 2006 ; Ünal et al, 2011 ; Bostrom et al, 2013 ; Boerman et al, 2017 ; Gironda and Korgaonkar, 2018 ), with a possible impact also on the FAA and on the consequent relation between these variables. Specifically, when information is limited, customers hardly undertake an in-depth commercial evaluation and an accurate final decision; conversely, when the information load increases, the capacity for information processing and the consistency of decision-making increase (Hahn et al, 1992 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As mentioned by Bang and Wojdynski [71], personalized ads are much more effective in attracting consumers' attention than non-personalized advertisements. On the other hand, Gironda and Korgaonkar [66] suggested that a number of factors, such as invasiveness, privacy control, perceived usefulness, and consumer innovativeness, are part of the user cognitive process when users are confronted with micro-targeted ads. In addition, Bleier and Eisenbeiss [95] presented the results of their lab study showing that more trusted retailers can increase the effectiveness of their ads by very narrow targeting without generating privacy concerns.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research on how personalization affects consumer behavior is very extensive [62]. Many researchers have already tested the impact of exclusively tailored advertising in traditional media [63], [64], in the online environment including social media and websites [65], [66], and in the context of mobile devices [67], [68]. The up-to-date findings prove that the impact of personalized advertising is ambiguous and may lead to very opposite responses from targeted users.…”
Section: User Reactiveness To Personalized Advertisingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Culotta & Cutler, 2016;Bilgihan, Barreda, Okumus & Nusair, 2016;Singh & Rana, 2017). Gironda & Korgaonkar (2018) examined consumers perception of personalized advertising. The study, which aimed to assess the effects of consumer perceptions of personalized advertising on purchase intention found that factors such as invasiveness, privacy controls, consumer innovativeness and perceived usefulness influenced how consumers perceived personalized advertisements.…”
Section: Consumer Perceptionmentioning
confidence: 99%