ISQUA16-2578CAN PATIENT INVOLVEMENT IMPROVE PATIENT SAFETY? A CLUSTER RANDOMIZED CONTROL TRIAL OF THE PATIENT REPORTING AND ACTION FOR A SAFE ENVIRONMENT (PRASE) INTERVENTION: Table 1

Lawton, Rebecca; Sheard, Laura; O’Hara, Jane

doi:10.1093/intqhc/mzw104.29

Cited by 3 publications

(10 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Seventeen of the twenty‐six studies were focused on inpatient safety, three on specific clinics or treatments and six were focused on treatment between face‐to‐face visits. The studies were conducted in a range of clinical areas including inpatient adult general medical services, 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 inpatient surgical departments, 40 , 41 , 42 adult oncology, 43 outpatient radiology clinics, 44 , 45 adult intensive care, 46 residential aged care facility, 39 inpatient paediatric services, 34 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 with two whole of hospital studies 52 , 53 and homecare visits, appointments, discharge and pharmacy community. 32 , 52 , 54 …”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…PRASE was trialled in 33 wards across 5 UK hospitals, which demonstrated a decrease in preventable harm at the ward level. 50 …”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Information about culture and ethnicity was variable, and only eight papers provided data about culture and language preferences. 31 , 32 , 36 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 50 , 53 No papers reported on any other diverse communication needs.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Three papers excluded participants not from dominant language groups for methodological reasons. 36 , 45 , 50 In the remaining papers, participation was open to all; however, people who opted to participate were often identified as well‐educated, 33 insured and 35 , 46 computer literate 35 , 46 and tended to be from the dominant language group.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“… 16 , 30 , 32 , 33 , 35 , 38 , 39 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 Two papers reported constrained resource‐limited adaptation of information to meet diverse needs of patients, identifying the absence of key groups as a study limitation. 36 , 50 Six papers contained commentary about the suitability of tools for CALD communities, noting that more older non‐Caucasian patients accessed the Open‐notes tool than anticipated, 53 the benefits of a visual tool 49 , 51 and highlighting the need for alternative or adapted strategies. 36 , 40 , 47 , 48 , 49 …”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Do patient engagement interventions work for all patients? A systematic review and realist synthesis of interventions to enhance patient safety

Newman

Joseph

Chauhan

et al. 2021

Health Expectations

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Patients are increasingly being asked for feedback about their healthcare and treatment, including safety, despite little evidence to support this trend. This review identifies the strategies used to engage patients in safety during direct care, explores who is engaged and determines the mechanisms that impact effectiveness. Methods: A systematic review was performed of seven databases (CINAHL, Cochrane, Cochrane-Central, Embase, ISI Web of Science, Medline, PsycINFO) that included research published between 2010 and 2020 focused on patient engagement interventions to increase safety during direct care and reported using PRISMA.All research designs were eligible; two reviewers applied criteria independently to determine eligibility and quality. A narrative review and realist synthesis were conducted.Results: Twenty-six papers reporting on twenty-seven patient engagement strategies were included and classified as consultation (9), involvement (7) and partnership (11). The definitions of 'patient engagement' varied, and we found limited details about participant characteristics or interactions between people utilizing strategies.Collaborative strategy development, a user-friendly design, proactive messaging and agency sponsorship were identified as mechanisms to improve engagement about safety at the point of direct care.Conclusions: Agency sponsorship of collaboration between staff and patients is essential in the development and implementation of strategies to keep patients safe during direct care. Insufficient details about participant characteristics and patient-provider interactions limit recommendations for practice change. MoreThis is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…PRASE was trialled in 33 wards across 5 UK hospitals, which demonstrated a decrease in preventable harm at the ward level. 50 …”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Do patient engagement interventions work for all patients? A systematic review and realist synthesis of interventions to enhance patient safety

Newman

Joseph

Chauhan

et al. 2021

Health Expectations

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Effects of consumers and health providers working in partnership on health services planning, delivery and evaluation

Lowe

Ryan

Schonfeld

et al. 2021

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Using consumer engagement strategies to improve healthcare safety for young people: An exploration of the relevance and suitability of current approaches

Newman

Joseph

McDonald

et al. 2022

Health Expectations

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Consumer engagement in health care is recognized as a critical strategy to minimize healthcare‐associated harms, however, little research has focussed on strategies to engage young people in healthcare safety. This study explores the suitability of commonly used engagement strategies, such as brochures, interactive bedside charts or apps, for young people (14–25 years) to improve their healthcare safety, with a focus on cancer care. Methods Four qualitative online workshops were conducted (N = 19). Two workshops included young people who had experienced cancer (n = 6) and two workshops included staff who support young people who had experienced a diagnosis of cancer (n = 12). Evidence from a systematic review was used to develop case studies of existing strategies as a topic guide for the online workshops. Data were analysed using a framework method and template analysis approach. Results Thematic analysis against the analytic framework led to the development of four principles for engagement with young people: empowerment, transparency, participatory culture and flexibility. The transition from being ‘looked after’ to young people being responsible for their own care was an integrative theme which intersected all elements of the framework. Conclusion For service providers to engage with young people about safety issues in cancer services, the strategies employed need to be tailored to consider the transitional nature of being an adolescent or young adult. A systemic approach that incorporates flexible, tailored engagement strategies, education and empowerment of young people and healthcare providers is required to engage effectively with young people about safety in healthcare. These findings may have implications beyond cancer care. Patient or Public Contribution Workshop content was developed with and by the CanEngage team, including the Consumer Advisory Group, who reviewed content and inform wider project priorities.

show abstract

ISQUA16-2578CAN PATIENT INVOLVEMENT IMPROVE PATIENT SAFETY? A CLUSTER RANDOMIZED CONTROL TRIAL OF THE PATIENT REPORTING AND ACTION FOR A SAFE ENVIRONMENT (PRASE) INTERVENTION: Table 1

Cited by 3 publications

References 0 publications

Do patient engagement interventions work for all patients? A systematic review and realist synthesis of interventions to enhance patient safety

Do patient engagement interventions work for all patients? A systematic review and realist synthesis of interventions to enhance patient safety

Effects of consumers and health providers working in partnership on health services planning, delivery and evaluation

Using consumer engagement strategies to improve healthcare safety for young people: An exploration of the relevance and suitability of current approaches

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About