2011
DOI: 10.1097/brs.0b013e318212b44b
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ISSLS Prize Winner

Abstract: Multifidus becomes stiffer, both in individual fibers and fiber bundles, in response to experimentally induced intervertebral disc degeneration. This cannot be explained by change in fiber-type due to reduced muscle use, nor by the increased size of the protein titin (which would reduce stiffness). We hypothesize that fiber bundles become stiffer by proliferation and/or reorganization of collagen content within the muscle but the basis for fiber stiffening is not known.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

5
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
28
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Human muscle fibers demonstrate different passive mechanical properties compared to bundles, which contain a connective tissue matrix layer (i.e., perimysium) that individual fibers do not (Fridén and Lieber, 2003;Lieber et al, 2003;Ward et al, 2009). Differences between fibers and bundles manifest themselves functionally as well in mouse Lieber, 2011, 2018), rat (Brown et al, 2011a), and rabbit (Brown et al, 2011b) skeletal muscle: bundles exhibit a larger stress at a given strain that is non-linear, whereas individual fibers often demonstrate a highly linear response (Figure 2). In our sample, linear fits to fiber stressstrain data explained over 90% of the experimental variability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Human muscle fibers demonstrate different passive mechanical properties compared to bundles, which contain a connective tissue matrix layer (i.e., perimysium) that individual fibers do not (Fridén and Lieber, 2003;Lieber et al, 2003;Ward et al, 2009). Differences between fibers and bundles manifest themselves functionally as well in mouse Lieber, 2011, 2018), rat (Brown et al, 2011a), and rabbit (Brown et al, 2011b) skeletal muscle: bundles exhibit a larger stress at a given strain that is non-linear, whereas individual fibers often demonstrate a highly linear response (Figure 2). In our sample, linear fits to fiber stressstrain data explained over 90% of the experimental variability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During IVD degeneration the multifidus muscle is constantly remodeling [8,7,9,14] and if elements of this remodeling begin before the macrophage transition this could provide a candidate mechanism to underpin this process. One possibility is the muscle fiber type transformation from slow (oxidative) to fast (glycolytic) that is significant by six months after IVD lesion [8,7], with a non-significant tendency at three months (19.8% lower slow fibers proportion than controls) [8,14]. Altered skeletal muscle microenvironment secondary to slow muscle fiber loss could affect the macrophage population and hyperalgesia [23,33,34].…”
Section: M1 Macrophages and Multifidus Structural Remodelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Acutely after IVD injury the deep back muscle, multifidus, undergoes rapid atrophy with neural inhibition [12,13]. In the subacute/early chronic period muscle fibrosis, fatty infiltration and transformation of muscle fibers from slow-tofast develops [8,7,14,9]. This progresses to muscle tissue atrophy with chronic degeneration [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experimentally induced intervertebral disc degeneration in the cat induces pathophysiologic changes to the MF 62. In a rabbit model, the MF becomes stiffer, both in individual fibers and in fiber bundles, in response to experimentally induced intervertebral disc degeneration, and a stiffer muscle can alter the biomechanical properties of the spine stabilizing system 62.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%