Issue Politicization in the European Parliament. An Analysis of Parliamentary Questions for Oral Answer (2004–19)*

Abstract

This article complements analyses of the partisan politicisation of the European Parliament from roll-call votes with an analysis of political groups' use of parliamentary questions. Questions offer an institutional opening for issue politicization and for partisan differentiation. Parliamentary groups have incentives to shape EU policies by drawing the attention to their topics of predilection and by controlling ongoing action. We make use of a new dataset on questions for oral answer (2004)(2005)(2006)(2007)(2008)(2009)(2010)(2011)(2012)(2013)(2014)(2015)(2016)(2017)(2018)(2019) to test if this results in European party groups emphasizing differentiated topics in their questions to the Commission and the Council. Our analyses confirm groups' differentiated issue attention. These findings have important implications for understanding the partisan politicization of EU policies and confirming the truly political nature of deliberation in the EP. They reveal patterns of partisan opposition different from those expressed in votes and emphasize the relevance of parliamentary questions as a key institutional window for politicization.

Triggers and Hierarchies of Social Identities in the European Parliament

“…In proposing that partisanship and nationality as organizational principles of the EP present social identities that are salient in some moments but not in others, this article identifies which policy issue makes one or the other identity salient in guiding individual behaviour and which identities (and combinations thereof) exhibit a stringent voting pattern. It thereby contributes to existing research on the question of issue salience of political groups (Guinaudeau and Costa, 2021) and seeks to shed light on the question of which social groups exert the strongest identification process and are thus most cohesive regarding the voting behaviour of their members. The main thesis put forward is that different policy issues trigger different social identities and that some social groups are more important than others, which are yet to specify.…”

Is There an Alternative to Consensus? The Impact of the 2014 Coalition Deal on Voting Behaviour in the Eighth European Parliament (2014–2019)

“…Specifically, the agreement is expected to have increased consensus only on policy issues on which the EPP and S&D groups usually have diverging views. Previous studies on the cooperation between the two groups have emphasised the role played by ideology (Hix et al, 2006, chapter 8;Guinaudeau & Costa, 2021). Because political actors have policy-oriented objectives, coalitions often form between groups that are ideologically close (De Swan, 1973).…”

The ‘European way of life’, a new narrative for the EU? Institutions’ vs citizens’ view

“…It is a resource to send messages to social constituencies and interest groups and to attract media attention (Rozenberg & Martin, 2011, p. 394). Parliamentary questions are also excellent tools to understand dynamics of politicization within the EP (Guinaudeau & Costa, 2021).…”